Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPieper, Karen S.
dc.contributor.authorGore, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorGranger, Christopher B.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Phillippe Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorEagle, Kim A.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Frederick A. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorBudaj, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorFox, Keith A. A.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:43:56Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2009-05-26
dc.date.submitted2011-09-23
dc.identifier.citationAm Heart J. 2009 Jun;157(6):1097-105. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.004">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0002-8703 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.004
dc.identifier.pmid19464422
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27207
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk model provides a simple method for determining the probability of hospital death in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to explore the impact of modeling techniques on the risk model when generating predictions. METHODS: Patients with ACS (n = 48,023) with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled (123 hospitals, 14 countries) between April 1999 and June 2006. The original GRACE model did not include terms to account for possible differences in outcomes between patients with STEMI, non-STEMI, and unstable angina, nor did it account for changing risk across continuous measures. RESULTS: In this cohort, the influence on outcome of region of hospitalization and cardiac arrest at presentation changed over the 7-year study. Other interactions included previous percutaneous coronary intervention and age with type of ACS. However, these interactions were insufficient to affect the final risk score. The same variables as in the original score comprise the new score. Inclusion of nonlinearity and differential effects did little to change the model's discrimination but influenced predictions for patients at extremes of risk. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the inclusion of nonlinear and interaction terms, the updated GRACE risk model provides an excellent means to discriminate risk of death in patients with ACS and can be used as a simple nomogram to estimate risk in patients seen in clinical practice.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=19464422&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.04.004
dc.subjectAcute Coronary Syndrome
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subject*Hospital Mortality
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Models, Cardiovascular
dc.subjectNomograms
dc.subjectPrognosis
dc.subject*Registries
dc.subjectRisk Assessment
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleValidity of a risk-prediction tool for hospital mortality: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAmerican heart journal
dc.source.volume157
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/24
dc.identifier.contextkey2254943
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk model provides a simple method for determining the probability of hospital death in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to explore the impact of modeling techniques on the risk model when generating predictions.</p> <p>METHODS: Patients with ACS (n = 48,023) with or without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were enrolled (123 hospitals, 14 countries) between April 1999 and June 2006. The original GRACE model did not include terms to account for possible differences in outcomes between patients with STEMI, non-STEMI, and unstable angina, nor did it account for changing risk across continuous measures.</p> <p>RESULTS: In this cohort, the influence on outcome of region of hospitalization and cardiac arrest at presentation changed over the 7-year study. Other interactions included previous percutaneous coronary intervention and age with type of ACS. However, these interactions were insufficient to affect the final risk score. The same variables as in the original score comprise the new score. Inclusion of nonlinearity and differential effects did little to change the model's discrimination but influenced predictions for patients at extremes of risk.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of the inclusion of nonlinear and interaction terms, the updated GRACE risk model provides an excellent means to discriminate risk of death in patients with ACS and can be used as a simple nomogram to estimate risk in patients seen in clinical practice.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcor_grace/24
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.source.pages1097-105


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record