Delay to angiography and outcomes following presentation with high-risk, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Authors
Swanson, NeilMontalescot, Gilles
Eagle, Kim A.
Goodman, Shaun G.
Huang, Wei
Brieger, David
Devlin, G.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Center for Outcomes ResearchDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2009-03-20Keywords
Acute Coronary SyndromeFemale
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization
Physician's Practice Patterns
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Quality of Health Care
Risk Assessment
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To test if delay-to-angiography (>72 hours from admission) in patients presenting with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) is associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN: GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) is a multinational registry of patients admitted with NSTE-ACS. SETTING: 14 countries with varying healthcare systems. PATIENTS: 23 396 high-risk NSTE-ACS patients with complete initial data collection entered into GRACE between 1999 and 2006 were analysed. INTERVENTIONS: Data were analysed according to delay-to-angiography and subsequent in-hospital or post-discharge adverse outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes recorded included death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischaemia, stroke, new heart failure and composite major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) comprising death, cerebrovascular accident and myocardial infarction. Revascularisation procedures were recorded. RESULTS: 10 089 (43.1%) had no in-hospital angiography. Median delay-to-angiography was 46 hours; 3680 (34%) patients waited >72 hours. 9.3% waited >7 days before angiography. Patients waiting longest were more often older, diabetic, women and had a history of heart failure, previous myocardial infarction or hypertension. Recurrent in-hospital ischaemia (33% vs 22%), reinfarction (8.4% vs 5.0%) and heart failure (14% vs 9.1%) were more common with delayed angiography. Delayed angiography was associated with better outcomes than no angiography (MACE 18.9% vs 22.2%, p = 0.015). MACE rates within six months of admission were higher with longer delay-to-angiography and highest of all with no angiography. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk NSTE-ACS is suboptimally managed with 43% not undergoing angiography. One-third of those undergoing angiography are delayed >72 hours. Longer delays were more likely with higher risk, sicker patients. These delays were associated with adverse outcomes at six months. Very long delay was associated with lower MACE, but not mortality, compared to conservative management.Source
Heart. 2009 Mar;95(3):211-5. Epub 2008 Sep 18. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1136/hrt.2008.149922Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27211PubMed ID
18801782Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1136/hrt.2008.149922