Impact of in-hospital revascularization on survival in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure
Authors
Steg, Phillippe GabrielKerner, Arthur
Van de Werf, Frans
Lopez-Sendon, Jose
Gore, Joel M.
Fitzgerald, Gordon
Feldman, Laurent J.
Anderson, Frederick A. Jr.
Avezum, Alvaro
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular MedicineDepartment of Surgery
Center for Outcomes Research
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2008-08-30Keywords
Acute Coronary SyndromeAged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Revascularization
data
Registries
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome complicated by congestive heart failure (CHF) have a poor prognosis. The aims of this study were to describe the use of revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and CHF and to analyze its impact on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 29 844 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were enrolled at 120 hospitals in 14 countries between April 1999 and June 2007; 4953 had CHF at presentation. One fifth of the patients with CHF underwent revascularization versus 35% of those without CHF (P<0.001). Among CHF patients, revascularized patients had lower-risk baseline clinical characteristics than nonrevascularized patients and were more likely to receive evidence-based cardiac medications. Hospital rates were not affected by revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.33, P=0.87). Death from discharge to 6-month follow-up was lower in patients who underwent revascularization than in those who did not (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.74, P<0.001). This difference persisted after adjustment for GRACE risk score variables, country, and propensity for revascularization (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.85, P=0.005). When revascularization as a time-varying covariate was taken into account in an adjusted Cox regression, the rate of death was again lower in patients undergoing revascularization (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests a low use of in-hospital revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with CHF. The consistent reduction in postdischarge death in revascularized patients suggests that broader application of revascularization in this high-risk group may be beneficial.Source
Circulation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1163-71. Epub 2008 Aug 25. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789685Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27218PubMed ID
18725494Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789685