Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteg, Phillippe Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorKerner, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorVan de Werf, Frans
dc.contributor.authorLopez-Sendon, Jose
dc.contributor.authorGore, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Gordon
dc.contributor.authorFeldman, Laurent J.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Frederick A. Jr.
dc.contributor.authorAvezum, Alvaro
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:08.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:43:59Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:43:59Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-30
dc.date.submitted2011-09-23
dc.identifier.citationCirculation. 2008 Sep 9;118(11):1163-71. Epub 2008 Aug 25. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789685">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0009-7322 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789685
dc.identifier.pmid18725494
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27218
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome complicated by congestive heart failure (CHF) have a poor prognosis. The aims of this study were to describe the use of revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and CHF and to analyze its impact on survival. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 29 844 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were enrolled at 120 hospitals in 14 countries between April 1999 and June 2007; 4953 had CHF at presentation. One fifth of the patients with CHF underwent revascularization versus 35% of those without CHF (P<0.001). Among CHF patients, revascularized patients had lower-risk baseline clinical characteristics than nonrevascularized patients and were more likely to receive evidence-based cardiac medications. Hospital rates were not affected by revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.33, P=0.87). Death from discharge to 6-month follow-up was lower in patients who underwent revascularization than in those who did not (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.74, P<0.001). This difference persisted after adjustment for GRACE risk score variables, country, and propensity for revascularization (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.85, P=0.005). When revascularization as a time-varying covariate was taken into account in an adjusted Cox regression, the rate of death was again lower in patients undergoing revascularization (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests a low use of in-hospital revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with CHF. The consistent reduction in postdischarge death in revascularized patients suggests that broader application of revascularization in this high-risk group may be beneficial.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=18725494&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789685
dc.subjectAcute Coronary Syndrome
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHeart Failure
dc.subjectHospitalization
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMyocardial Revascularization
dc.subjectdata
dc.subjectRegistries
dc.subjectRegression Analysis
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectSurvival Rate
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleImpact of in-hospital revascularization on survival in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and congestive heart failure
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleCirculation
dc.source.volume118
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/36
dc.identifier.contextkey2254955
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome complicated by congestive heart failure (CHF) have a poor prognosis. The aims of this study were to describe the use of revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and CHF and to analyze its impact on survival.</p> <p>METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, 29 844 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were enrolled at 120 hospitals in 14 countries between April 1999 and June 2007; 4953 had CHF at presentation. One fifth of the patients with CHF underwent revascularization versus 35% of those without CHF (P<0.001). Among CHF patients, revascularized patients had lower-risk baseline clinical characteristics than nonrevascularized patients and were more likely to receive evidence-based cardiac medications. Hospital rates were not affected by revascularization (adjusted hazard ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.33, P=0.87). Death from discharge to 6-month follow-up was lower in patients who underwent revascularization than in those who did not (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.74, P<0.001). This difference persisted after adjustment for GRACE risk score variables, country, and propensity for revascularization (odds ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.85, P=0.005). When revascularization as a time-varying covariate was taken into account in an adjusted Cox regression, the rate of death was again lower in patients undergoing revascularization (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93, P=0.02).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: This observational study suggests a low use of in-hospital revascularization in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with CHF. The consistent reduction in postdischarge death in revascularized patients suggests that broader application of revascularization in this high-risk group may be beneficial.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcor_grace/36
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.source.pages1163-71


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record