We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 11, 2024. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed during this period. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Patterns of use and potential impact of early beta-blocker therapy in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction with and without heart failure: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Emery, MichaelLopez-Sendon, Jose
Steg, Phillippe Gabriel
Anderson, Frederick A. Jr.
Dabbous, Omar H.
Scheuble, Aliocha
Eagle, Kim A.
GRACE Investigators
UMass Chan Affiliations
Center for Outcomes ResearchDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2006-12-13Keywords
Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAged
Drug Administration Schedule
Electrocardiography
Female
Heart Failure
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Male
Myocardial Infarction
Registries
Treatment Outcome
Health Services Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Early beta-blocker (BB) therapy improves outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; however, limited data are available on its early use and its impact in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: We evaluated data from 7106 patients with NSTEMI, without contraindications to BBs, enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events between April 1999 and September 2004. Baseline characteristics, management, and outcomes were analyzed according to the use of oral (+/-intravenous) BB within 24 hours of presentation. Multivariable analysis was conducted adjusting for comorbidities using the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events risk model (c statistic 0.83). RESULTS: Beta-blocker therapy was initiated within the first 24 hours in 76% of patients with NSTEMI (79% with Killip class I vs 62% with class II/III; P < .001). Failure to initiate BBs within the first 24 hours was associated with lower rates of subsequent BB therapy (P < .001) and other evidence-based therapies. Early BB therapy was correlated with lower hospital mortality for NSTEMI patients (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.81) and for those with Killip class II/III (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.68) with a trend toward lower mortality in the Killip class I group (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.49-1.21). At 6 months postdischarge, early BB use was associated with lower mortality in NSTEMI patients (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.997) with a trend toward lower mortality in patients with Killip class I or II/III. CONCLUSIONS: Many eligible patients do not receive early BB therapy. Treatment with early BBs may have a beneficial impact on hospital and 6-month mortality in all patients, including those presenting with heart failure.Source
Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1015-21. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.024Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27236PubMed ID
17161045Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.024