Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEagle, Kim A.
dc.contributor.authorLim, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorDabbous, Omar H.
dc.contributor.authorPieper, Karen S.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorVan de Werf, Frans
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Shaun G.
dc.contributor.authorGranger, Christopher B.
dc.contributor.authorSteg, Phillippe Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorGore, Joel M.
dc.contributor.authorBudaj, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorAvezum, Alvaro
dc.contributor.authorFlather, Marcus D.
dc.contributor.authorFox, Keith A. A.
dc.contributor.authorGRACE Investigators
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:09.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:44:10Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:44:10Z
dc.date.issued2004-06-10
dc.date.submitted2011-09-23
dc.identifier.citationJAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2727-33. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2727">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0098-7484 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jama.291.22.2727
dc.identifier.pmid15187054
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27257
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Accurate estimation of risk for untoward outcomes after patients have been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and intensity of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple decision tool for bedside risk estimation of 6-month mortality in patients surviving admission for an ACS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multinational registry, involving 94 hospitals in 14 countries, that used data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) to develop and validate a multivariable stepwise regression model for death during 6 months postdischarge. From 17,142 patients presenting with an ACS from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, and discharged alive, 15,007 (87.5%) had complete 6-month follow-up and represented the development cohort for a model that was subsequently tested on a validation cohort of 7638 patients admitted from April 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality during 6 months postdischarge after admission for an ACS. RESULTS: The 6-month mortality rates were similar in the development (n = 717; 4.8%) and validation cohorts (n = 331; 4.7%). The risk-prediction tool for all forms of ACS identified 9 variables predictive of 6-month mortality: older age, history of myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, increased pulse rate at presentation, lower systolic blood pressure at presentation, elevated initial serum creatinine level, elevated initial serum cardiac biomarker levels, ST-segment depression on presenting electrocardiogram, and not having a percutaneous coronary intervention performed in hospital. The c statistics for the development and validation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE 6-month postdischarge prediction model is a simple, robust tool for predicting mortality in patients with ACS. Clinicians may find it simple to use and applicable to clinical practice.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15187054&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.22.2727
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAngina, Unstable
dc.subjectCause of Death
dc.subject*Decision Support Techniques
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHospitalization
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMyocardial Ischemia
dc.subjectRegistries
dc.subject*Risk Assessment
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleA validated prediction model for all forms of acute coronary syndrome: estimating the risk of 6-month postdischarge death in an international registry
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association
dc.source.volume291
dc.source.issue22
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cor_grace/75
dc.identifier.contextkey2254996
html.description.abstract<p>CONTEXT: Accurate estimation of risk for untoward outcomes after patients have been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) may help clinicians guide the type and intensity of therapy.</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple decision tool for bedside risk estimation of 6-month mortality in patients surviving admission for an ACS.</p> <p>DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multinational registry, involving 94 hospitals in 14 countries, that used data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) to develop and validate a multivariable stepwise regression model for death during 6 months postdischarge. From 17,142 patients presenting with an ACS from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, and discharged alive, 15,007 (87.5%) had complete 6-month follow-up and represented the development cohort for a model that was subsequently tested on a validation cohort of 7638 patients admitted from April 1, 2002, to December 31, 2003.</p> <p>MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: All-cause mortality during 6 months postdischarge after admission for an ACS.</p> <p>RESULTS: The 6-month mortality rates were similar in the development (n = 717; 4.8%) and validation cohorts (n = 331; 4.7%). The risk-prediction tool for all forms of ACS identified 9 variables predictive of 6-month mortality: older age, history of myocardial infarction, history of heart failure, increased pulse rate at presentation, lower systolic blood pressure at presentation, elevated initial serum creatinine level, elevated initial serum cardiac biomarker levels, ST-segment depression on presenting electrocardiogram, and not having a percutaneous coronary intervention performed in hospital. The c statistics for the development and validation cohorts were 0.81 and 0.75, respectively.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The GRACE 6-month postdischarge prediction model is a simple, robust tool for predicting mortality in patients with ACS. Clinicians may find it simple to use and applicable to clinical practice.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcor_grace/75
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.source.pages2727-33


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record