Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPederson, Thoru
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:11.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:45:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:45:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-06
dc.date.submitted2022-03-16
dc.identifier.citation<p>Pederson T. US companies' COVID patents: Will "the saints go marching in"? FASEB J. 2021 Oct;35(10):e21879. doi: 10.1096/fj.202101282. PMID: 34486747. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202101282">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0892-6638 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1096/fj.202101282
dc.identifier.pmid34486747
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27553
dc.description.abstractMany pandemic issues have been swirling around in our country, and most have received extensive media coverage, most notably vaccine hesitancy/resistance, the Delta variant, and the continuing extreme importance of masking. Another is the collective angst over the time it is taking the FDA to issue full approvals of the earliest vaccines to apply for it. (It is anticipated that at least one vaccine will have received this by the time this editorial appears.) In the background, not exactly sotto voce but receiving less print, is the question of whether the US government might exercise its so-called march-in authority on the relevant patents. Its statutory footing and operative domain are often misunderstood, and here I seek to clarify this for our readers. I am motivated to do so because I did not initially understand it either.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=34486747&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202101282
dc.subjectImmunology and Infectious Disease
dc.subjectInfectious Disease
dc.subjectMicrobiology
dc.subjectTechnology and Innovation
dc.subjectVirus Diseases
dc.titleUS companies' COVID patents: Will "the saints go marching in"?
dc.typeEditorial
dc.source.journaltitleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
dc.source.volume35
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/covid19/354
dc.identifier.contextkey28374454
html.description.abstract<p>Many pandemic issues have been swirling around in our country, and most have received extensive media coverage, most notably vaccine hesitancy/resistance, the Delta variant, and the continuing extreme importance of masking. Another is the collective angst over the time it is taking the FDA to issue full approvals of the earliest vaccines to apply for it. (It is anticipated that at least one vaccine will have received this by the time this editorial appears.)</p> <p>In the background, not exactly <em>sotto voce</em> but receiving less print, is the question of whether the US government might exercise its so-called march-in authority on the relevant patents. Its statutory footing and operative domain are often misunderstood, and here I seek to clarify this for our readers. I am motivated to do so because I did not initially understand it either.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcovid19/354
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology
dc.source.pagese21879


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record