Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHyuk Lee, Jong
dc.contributor.authorHong, Hyunsook
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyungjin
dc.contributor.authorHyun Lee, Chang
dc.contributor.authorMo Goo, Jin
dc.contributor.authorYoon, Soon Ho
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:11.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:45:41Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-04
dc.date.submitted2022-04-07
dc.identifier.citation<p>Lee JH, Hong H, Kim H, Lee CH, Goo JM, Yoon SH. CT Examinations for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Radiation Dose, and Numbers Needed to Diagnose and Predict. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2021 Nov;82(6):1505-1523. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2021.0096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2021.0096</a></p>
dc.identifier.doi10.3348/jksr.2021.0096
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27586
dc.description<p>English language version of an article published in Korean.</p>
dc.description.abstractPurpose Although chest CT has been discussed as a first-line test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), little research has explored the implications of CT exposure in the population. To review chest CT protocols and radiation doses in COVID-19 publications and explore the number needed to diagnose (NND) and the number needed to predict (NNP) if CT is used as a first-line test. Materials and Methods We searched nine highly cited radiology journals to identify studies discussing the CT-based diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Study-level information on the CT protocol and radiation dose was collected, and the doses were compared with each national diagnostic reference level (DRL). The NND and NNP, which depends on the test positive rate (TPR), were calculated, given a CT sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%–96%) and specificity of 37% (95% CI: 26%–50%), and applied to the early outbreak in Wuhan, New York, and Italy. Results From 86 studies, the CT protocol and radiation dose were reported in 81 (94.2%) and 17 studies (19.8%), respectively. Low-dose chest CT was used more than twice as often as standard-dose chest CT (39.5% vs.18.6%), while the remaining studies (44.2%) did not provide relevant information. The radiation doses were lower than the national DRLs in 15 of the 17 studies (88.2%) that reported doses. The NND was 3.2 scans (95% CI: 2.2–6.0). The NNPs at TPRs of 50%, 25%, 10%, and 5% were 2.2, 3.6, 8.0, 15.5 scans, respectively. In Wuhan, 35418 (TPR, 58%; 95% CI: 27710–56755) to 44840 (TPR, 38%; 95% CI: 35161–68164) individuals were estimated to have undergone CT examinations to diagnose 17365 patients. During the early surge in New York and Italy, daily NNDs changed up to 5.4 and 10.9 times, respectively, within 10 weeks. Conclusion Low-dose CT protocols were described in less than half of COVID-19 publications, and radiation doses were frequently lacking. The number of populations involved in a first-line diagnostic CT test could vary dynamically according to daily TPR; therefore, caution is required in future planning.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCopyrights © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectCoronavirus
dc.subjectTomography
dc.subjectX-Ray Computed
dc.subjectRadiation Dosage
dc.subjectMass Screening
dc.subjectClinical Protocols
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectInfectious Disease
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.subjectVirus Diseases
dc.titleCT Examinations for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Radiation Dose, and Numbers Needed to Diagnose and Predict
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the Korean Society of Radiology
dc.source.volume82
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1392&amp;context=covid19&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/covid19/385
dc.identifier.contextkey28522699
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:45:42Z
html.description.abstract<p>Purpose</p> <p>Although chest CT has been discussed as a first-line test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), little research has explored the implications of CT exposure in the population. To review chest CT protocols and radiation doses in COVID-19 publications and explore the number needed to diagnose (NND) and the number needed to predict (NNP) if CT is used as a first-line test.</p> <p>Materials and Methods</p> <p>We searched nine highly cited radiology journals to identify studies discussing the CT-based diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Study-level information on the CT protocol and radiation dose was collected, and the doses were compared with each national diagnostic reference level (DRL). The NND and NNP, which depends on the test positive rate (TPR), were calculated, given a CT sensitivity of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91%–96%) and specificity of 37% (95% CI: 26%–50%), and applied to the early outbreak in Wuhan, New York, and Italy.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>From 86 studies, the CT protocol and radiation dose were reported in 81 (94.2%) and 17 studies (19.8%), respectively. Low-dose chest CT was used more than twice as often as standard-dose chest CT (39.5% vs.18.6%), while the remaining studies (44.2%) did not provide relevant information. The radiation doses were lower than the national DRLs in 15 of the 17 studies (88.2%) that reported doses. The NND was 3.2 scans (95% CI: 2.2–6.0). The NNPs at TPRs of 50%, 25%, 10%, and 5% were 2.2, 3.6, 8.0, 15.5 scans, respectively. In Wuhan, 35418 (TPR, 58%; 95% CI: 27710–56755) to 44840 (TPR, 38%; 95% CI: 35161–68164) individuals were estimated to have undergone CT examinations to diagnose 17365 patients. During the early surge in New York and Italy, daily NNDs changed up to 5.4 and 10.9 times, respectively, within 10 weeks.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Low-dose CT protocols were described in less than half of COVID-19 publications, and radiation doses were frequently lacking. The number of populations involved in a first-line diagnostic CT test could vary dynamically according to daily TPR; therefore, caution is required in future planning.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcovid19/385
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology
dc.source.pages1505-1523


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2016JKSR_jksr_82_1505.pdf
Size:
1.243Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyrights © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyrights © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.