COVID-19 Impact on Well-Being and Education in Radiology Residencies: A Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Robbins, Jessica B.England, Eric
Patel, Maitray D.
DeBenedectis, Carolynn M
Sarkany, David S.
Heitkamp, Darel E.
Milburn, James M.
Kalia, Vivek
Ali, Kamran
Gaviola, Glenn C.
Ho, Christopher P.
Jay, Ann K.
Ong, Seng
Jordan, Sheryl G.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of RadiologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2020-08-01Keywords
Association of Program Directors in RadiologyCOVID-19
Program director
Radiology resident
Well-being
Health and Medical Administration
Infectious Disease
Medical Education
Mental and Social Health
Psychiatry and Psychology
Radiology
Virus Diseases
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced rapid evolution of the healthcare environment. Efforts to mitigate the spread of the virus through social distancing and shelter-at-home edicts have unintended consequences upon clinical and educational missions and mental well-being of radiology departments. We sought to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiology residencies with respect to the educational mission and perceptions of impact on well-being. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was IRB exempt. An anonymous 22 question survey regarding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on educational and clinical missions of residencies, its perceived impact upon morale of radiologists and trainees and a query of innovative solutions devised in response, was emailed to the Association of Program Directors in Radiology membership. Survey data were collected using SurveyMonkey (San Mateo, California). RESULTS: Respondents felt the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted their residency programs. Regarding the educational mission impact, 70.1% (75/107) report moderate/marked negative impact and 2.8% (3/107) that educational activities have ceased. Regarding the pandemic's impact on resident morale, 44.8% (48/107) perceive moderate/marked negative effect; perceived resident morale in programs with redeployment is significantly worse with 57.1% (12/21) reporting moderate/marked decrease. Respondents overwhelmingly report adequate resident access to mental health resources during the acute phase of the pandemic (88.8%, 95/107). Regarding morale of program directors, 61% (65/106) report either mild or marked decreased morale. Program innovations reported by program directors were catalogued and shared. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has markedly impacted the perceived well-being and educational missions of radiology residency programs across the United States.Source
Robbins JB, England E, Patel MD, DeBenedectis CM, Sarkany DS, Heitkamp DE, Milburn JM, Kalia V, Ali K, Gaviola GC, Ho CP, Jay AK, Ong S, Jordan SG. COVID-19 Impact on Well-Being and Education in Radiology Residencies: A Survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology. Acad Radiol. 2020 Aug;27(8):1162-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.002. Epub 2020 Jun 13. PMID: 32571648; PMCID: PMC7293482. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.002Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/27603PubMed ID
32571648Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.002
Scopus Count
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
In Seas of Change, a Call to Action: 2021 American Board of Medical Specialties Policy on Parental, Caregiver, and Medical Leave During TrainingRaybon, Courtney P.; Jordan, Sheryl G.; Deitte, Lori A.; DeBenedectis, Carolynn M; Jay, Ann K.; Robbins, Jessica B. (2021-03-31)Institutional graduate medical education (GME) programs are guided by architecture built by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and, as radiology programs, the American Board of Radiology (ABR). At its core, GME is dynamic and progressive, committed to enhancing resident education and improving the patient care that residents deliver. In 2019 and 2020, new ACGME program requirements and the expanded second edition of ACGME Radiology Milestones added new guidelines affecting all accredited radiology residencies. The ABMS has prescribed additional needed changes for our residencies, in the form of parental, caregiver and medical leave. In this manuscript, members of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR) Wellness Task Force define the current status of family leave and outline changes slated for July 1, 2021.
-
Noninterpretive Uses of Artificial Intelligence in RadiologyRichardson, Michael L.; Garwood, Elisabeth R; Lee, Yueh; Li, Matthew D.; Lo, Hao S.; Nagaraju, Arun; Nguyen, Xuan V.; Probyn, Linda; Rajiah, Prabhakar; Sin, Jessica; et al. (2020-02-12)We deem a computer to exhibit artificial intelligence (AI) when it performs a task that would normally require intelligent action by a human. Much of the recent excitement about AI in the medical literature has revolved around the ability of AI models to recognize anatomy and detect pathology on medical images, sometimes at the level of expert physicians. However, AI can also be used to solve a wide range of noninterpretive problems that are relevant to radiologists and their patients. This review summarizes some of the newer noninterpretive uses of AI in radiology.
-
Similarity of chest X-ray and thermal imaging of focal pneumonia: a randomised proof of concept study at a large urban teaching hospitalWang, Linda T.; Cleveland, Robert H.; Binder, William; Zwerdling, Robert G.; Stamoulis, Caterina; Ptak, Thomas; Sherman, Mindy; Haver, Kenan; Sagar, Pallavi; Hibberd, Patricia (2018-01-05)OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of thermal imaging (TI) in the setting of focal consolidative pneumonia with chest X-ray (CXR) as the gold standard. SETTING: A large, 973-bed teaching hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: 47 patients enrolled, 15 in a training set, 32 in a test set. Age range 10 months to 82 years (median=50 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects received CXR with subsequent TI within 4 hours of each other. CXR and TI were assessed in blinded random order. Presence of focal opacity (pneumonia) on CXR, the outcome parameter, was recorded. For TI, presence of area(s) of increased heat (pneumonia) was recorded. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the significance of the correlations of positive findings in the same anatomical region. RESULTS: With TI compared with the CXR (the outcome parameter), sensitivity was 80.0% (95% CIs 29.9% to 98.9%), specificity was 57.7% (95% CI 37.2% to 76.0%). Positive predictive value of TI was 26.7% (95% CI 8.9% to 55.2%) and its negative predictive value was 93.8% (95% CI 67.7% to 99.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study confirms proof of concept that chest TI is consistent with CXR in suggesting similarly localised focal pneumonia with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Further investigation of TI as a point-of-care imaging modality is warranted.