Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoni, Apurv
dc.contributor.authorKhubchandani, Jasmine A.
dc.contributor.authorFahey, Nisha
dc.contributor.authorRaithatha, Nitin
dc.contributor.authorPrabhakaran, Anusha
dc.contributor.authorByatt, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorMoore Simas, Tiffany A.
dc.contributor.authorPhatak, Ajay
dc.contributor.authorRosal, Milagros C
dc.contributor.authorNimbalkar, Somashekhar
dc.contributor.authorAllison, Jeroan J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:16.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:48:32Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:48:32Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-16
dc.date.submitted2017-07-02
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/wscg-fx31
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28230
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To examine the relationship of caste and class with perceived discrimination among pregnant women from rural western India. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 170 pregnant women in rural Gujarat, India, who were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study. Everyday Discrimination Scale and Experiences of Discrimination questionnaires were used to assess perceived discrimination and response to discrimination. Based on self-reported caste, women were classified to three categories with increasing historical disadvantage: General, Other Backward Castes (OBC), and Scheduled Caste or Tribes (SC/ST). Socioeconomic class was determined using standardized Kuppuswamy scale. Regression models for count and binomial data were used to examine association of caste and class with experience of discrimination and response to discrimination. Results: 68% of women experienced discrimination. After adjusting for confounders, there was a consistent trend and association of discrimination with caste but not class. In comparison to General Caste, lower caste (OBC, SC/ST) women were more likely to 1) experience discrimination (OBC OR: 2.2, SC/ST: 4.1; p-trend: 0.01), 2) have a greater perceived discrimination score (OBC IRR: 1.3, SC/ST: 1.5; p-trend: 0.07), 3) accept discrimination (OBC OR: 6.4, SC/ST: 7.6; p-trend: < 0.01), and 4) keep to herself about discrimination (OBC OR: 2.7, SC/ST: 3.6; p-trend: 0.04). Conclusion: The differential experience of discrimination by lower caste women in comparison to upper caste women and their response to such experiences highlight the importance of studying discrimination to understand existing caste-based disparities.
dc.formatflash_audio
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCopyright the Author(s)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
dc.subjectpregnant women
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subjectcaste
dc.subjectclass
dc.subjectdiscrimination
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectInequality and Stratification
dc.subjectSocial Psychology
dc.subjectSocial Psychology and Interaction
dc.subjectTranslational Medical Research
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleCaste Matters: Perceived Discrimination among Women in Rural India
dc.typePoster Abstract
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1570&amp;context=cts_retreat&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cts_retreat/2017/posters/75
dc.identifier.contextkey10386443
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:48:32Z
html.description.abstract<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> To examine the relationship of caste and class with perceived discrimination among pregnant women from rural western India.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional survey was administered to 170 pregnant women in rural Gujarat, India, who were enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study. Everyday Discrimination Scale and Experiences of Discrimination questionnaires were used to assess perceived discrimination and response to discrimination. Based on self-reported caste, women were classified to three categories with increasing historical disadvantage: General, Other Backward Castes (OBC), and Scheduled Caste or Tribes (SC/ST). Socioeconomic class was determined using standardized</p> <p>Kuppuswamy scale. Regression models for count and binomial data were used to examine association of caste and class with experience of discrimination and response to discrimination.</p> <p>Results: 68% of women experienced discrimination. After adjusting for confounders, there was a consistent trend and association of discrimination with caste but not class. In comparison to General Caste, lower caste (OBC, SC/ST) women were more likely to 1) experience discrimination (OBC OR: 2.2, SC/ST: 4.1; p-trend: 0.01), 2) have a greater perceived discrimination score (OBC IRR: 1.3, SC/ST: 1.5; p-trend: 0.07), 3) accept discrimination (OBC OR: 6.4, SC/ST: 7.6; p-trend: < 0.01), and 4) keep to herself about discrimination (OBC OR: 2.7, SC/ST: 3.6; p-trend: 0.04).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The differential experience of discrimination by lower caste women in comparison to upper caste women and their response to such experiences highlight the importance of studying discrimination to understand existing caste-based disparities.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathcts_retreat/2017/posters/75


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
74_Soni_1.docx
Size:
15.16Kb
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Thumbnail
Name:
auto_convert.pdf
Size:
13.55Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright the Author(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright the Author(s)