Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelland, Gregg
dc.contributor.authorGaspari, Romolo Joseph
dc.contributor.authorLicciardo, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorSanseverino, Alexandra
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Ulises
dc.contributor.authorEmhoff, Timothy A.
dc.contributor.authorBlehar, David J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:49:30Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.date.submitted2018-01-19
dc.identifier.citation<p>Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Oct;23(10):1170-1175. doi: 10.1111/acem.13054. Epub 2016 Sep 27. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13054">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.13054
dc.identifier.pmid27428394
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28448
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) has been shown to be effective at identifying a pneumothorax (PTX); however, the additional value of adding multiple views has not been studied. Single- and four-view protocols have both been described in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of single-view versus four-view lung US to detect clinically significant PTX in trauma patients. METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective trial on trauma patients. Adult patients with acute traumatic injury undergoing computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to a single view or four views of each hemithorax prior to any imaging. USs were performed and interpreted by credentialed physicians using a 7.5-Mhz linear array transducer on a portable US machine with digital clips recorded for later review. Attending radiologist interpretation of the chest CT was reviewed for presence or absence of PTX with descriptions of small foci of air or minimal PTX categorized as clinically insignificant. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were enrolled over a 2-year period. A total of 139 patients received a single view of each chest wall and 121 patients received four views. There were a total of 49 patients that had a PTX (19%), and 29 of these were clinically significant (11%). In diagnosis of any PTX, both single-view and four-view techniques showed poor sensitivity (54.2 and 68%) but high specificity (99 and 98%). For clinically significant PTX, single-view US demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1% to 99.6%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI = 95.5% to 99.9%), with sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI = 66% to 99.7%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI = 92.1% to 99.7%) for four views. CONCLUSIONS: Single-view and four-view chest wall USs demonstrate comparable sensitivity and specificity for PTX. The additional time to obtain four views should be weighed against the absence of additional diagnostic yield over a single view when using US to identify a clinically significant PTX.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27428394&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13054
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectRadiology
dc.titleComparison of Four Views to Single-view Ultrasound Protocols to Identify Clinically Significant Pneumothorax
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
dc.source.volume23
dc.source.issue10
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/emed_pp/131
dc.identifier.contextkey11389151
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) has been shown to be effective at identifying a pneumothorax (PTX); however, the additional value of adding multiple views has not been studied. Single- and four-view protocols have both been described in the literature. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of single-view versus four-view lung US to detect clinically significant PTX in trauma patients.</p> <p>METHODS: This was a randomized, prospective trial on trauma patients. Adult patients with acute traumatic injury undergoing computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomized to a single view or four views of each hemithorax prior to any imaging. USs were performed and interpreted by credentialed physicians using a 7.5-Mhz linear array transducer on a portable US machine with digital clips recorded for later review. Attending radiologist interpretation of the chest CT was reviewed for presence or absence of PTX with descriptions of small foci of air or minimal PTX categorized as clinically insignificant.</p> <p>RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were enrolled over a 2-year period. A total of 139 patients received a single view of each chest wall and 121 patients received four views. There were a total of 49 patients that had a PTX (19%), and 29 of these were clinically significant (11%). In diagnosis of any PTX, both single-view and four-view techniques showed poor sensitivity (54.2 and 68%) but high specificity (99 and 98%). For clinically significant PTX, single-view US demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1% to 99.6%) and a specificity of 99.2% (95% CI = 95.5% to 99.9%), with sensitivity of 93.3% (95% CI = 66% to 99.7%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI = 92.1% to 99.7%) for four views.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Single-view and four-view chest wall USs demonstrate comparable sensitivity and specificity for PTX. The additional time to obtain four views should be weighed against the absence of additional diagnostic yield over a single view when using US to identify a clinically significant PTX.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathemed_pp/131
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.pages1170-1175


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record