Sex Differences in Poisonings Among Older Adults: An Analysis of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) Registry, 2010 to 2016
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Beauchamp, Gillian A.Carey, Jennifer L.
Adams, Tyler
Wier, Amy
Colon, Manuel F.
Cook, Matthew
Cannon, Robert
Katz, Kenneth D.
Greenberg, Marna Rayl
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Medical ToxicologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2018-08-01Keywords
managementmedical toxicology
older adults
poisonings
prevention
sex differences
Emergency Medicine
Geriatrics
Medical Toxicology
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Environmental Health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: Adults aged > 65 years are susceptible to intentional and unintentional poisoning, with contributing factors that include polypharmacy, comorbidity, susceptibility to medication error, and gaps in research. Although toxicologists are often tasked with managing and preventing poisoning among older adults, little is known about sex differences in these poisonings. The aim of this study was to review sex differences in poisonings among older adults managed at the bedside by medical toxicologists. METHODS: All case subjects aged > 65 years in the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) registry between January 2010 and December 2016 were reviewed. Data included reasons for exposure and consultation, exposure agents and routes, presenting clinical findings, and treatment provided. Cases missing age, sex, or primary reason for toxicology consultation data were excluded. We used chi(2) tests to assess differences in distribution of study variables according to participant sex. FINDINGS: Among 51,441 total registry cases, 542 (1.05%) were excluded because of missing data. Among the remaining 50,899 cases, 2930 (5.8%) were included for age > 65 years; 52.3% of older adults were female. Race was missing or unknown for 49.2% of cases. Adverse drug reactions were more commonly encountered in female subjects than in their male counterparts (9.6% vs 6.4%; P=0.001). No statistically significant sex differences were observed for total numbers of intentional, unintentional pharmaceutical, and nonpharmaceutical exposures. The most common medications involved were cardiovascular (16.8%) and analgesics/opioids (14.8%). Female subjects were more likely than male subjects to be evaluated by a toxicologist for cardiovascular medications (18.7% vs 14.7%; P=0.004) and analgesics/opioids (17.6% vs 11.8%; P < 0.001). Male subjects were more likely than female subjects to be evaluated for ethanol toxicity (7.4% vs 1%; P < 0.001) and for envenomations (4.2% vs 1.8%; P < 0.001). The most common route of exposure was oral ingestion (81.3%). Signs/symptoms were noted in 54.8% of cases, with the most common abnormal vital sign being bradycardia (17.2%). Pharmacologic support was the most common intervention and was more common in male subjects than in female subjects (17.7% vs 12.3%; P < 0.001). Deaths were reported in 38 female subjects (2.45%) and 46 male subjects (3.34%); there was no statistically significant difference in death rate according to sex (P=0.148). IMPLICATIONS: Older female adults were more commonly evaluated by a medical toxicologist for an adverse drug reaction than older male adults. Female patients were more likely than male patients to be evaluated for poisoning related to analgesic/opioids and cardiovascular medications, and older male patients more frequently received pharmacologic support than older female patients. No significant sex differences were observed in numbers of toxicology consultations for intentional, unintentional pharmaceutical, and nonpharmaceutical exposures.Source
Clin Ther. 2018 Aug;40(8):1366-1374.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.012Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28470PubMed ID
30072041Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.06.012