Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGallahue, Fiona E.
dc.contributor.authorHiller, Katherine M.
dc.contributor.authorBird, Steven B.
dc.contributor.authorCalderone Haas, Mary Rose
dc.contributor.authorDeiorio, Nicole M.
dc.contributor.authorHern, H. Gene
dc.contributor.authorJarou, Zachary J.
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Ava
dc.contributor.authorGeiger, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Laura
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:49:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:49:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-19
dc.date.submitted2019-08-05
dc.identifier.citation<p>Acad Med. 2019 Mar 19. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002714. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002714">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1040-2446 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ACM.0000000000002714
dc.identifier.pmid30893064
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28489
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate how emergency medicine (EM) residency programs perceived and used Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) SVI total scores and videos during the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) 2018 cycle. METHOD: Study 1 (November 2017) used a program director survey to evaluate user reactions to the SVI following the first year of operational use. Study 2 (January 2018) analyzed program usage of SVI video responses using data collected through the AAMC Program Director's Workstation. RESULTS: Results from the survey (125/175 programs, 71% response rate) and video usage analysis suggested programs viewed videos out of curiosity and to understand the range of SVI total scores. Programs were more likely to view videos for attendees of U.S. MD-granting medical schools and applicants with higher United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, but there were no differences by gender or race/ethnicity. More than half of programs that did not use SVI total scores in their selection processes were unsure of how to incorporate them (36/58, 62%) and wanted additional research on utility (33/58, 57%). More than half of programs indicated being at least somewhat likely to use SVI total scores (55/97; 57%) and videos (52/99; 53%) in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Program reactions on the utility and ease of use of SVI total scores were mixed. Survey results indicate programs used the SVI cautiously in their selection processes, consistent with AAMC recommendations. Future surveys of SVI users will help the AAMC gauge improvements in user acceptance and familiarity with the SVI.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=30893064&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002714
dc.rightsCopyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is a PDF file of an accepted manuscript that has been accepted for publication and posted with a 12 month embargo and Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.wkopenhealth.com/Institutions.html.
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectemergency medicine
dc.subjectresidency
dc.subjectselection
dc.subjectvideo interviews
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectHealth and Medical Administration
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.titleThe AAMC Standardized Video Interview: Reactions and Use by Residency Programs During the 2018 Application Cycle
dc.typeAccepted Manuscript
dc.source.journaltitleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&amp;context=emed_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/emed_pp/181
dc.legacy.embargo2020-03-19T00:00:00-07:00
dc.identifier.contextkey15060313
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:49:40Z
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: To evaluate how emergency medicine (EM) residency programs perceived and used Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) SVI total scores and videos during the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) 2018 cycle.</p> <p>METHOD: Study 1 (November 2017) used a program director survey to evaluate user reactions to the SVI following the first year of operational use. Study 2 (January 2018) analyzed program usage of SVI video responses using data collected through the AAMC Program Director's Workstation.</p> <p>RESULTS: Results from the survey (125/175 programs, 71% response rate) and video usage analysis suggested programs viewed videos out of curiosity and to understand the range of SVI total scores. Programs were more likely to view videos for attendees of U.S. MD-granting medical schools and applicants with higher United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, but there were no differences by gender or race/ethnicity. More than half of programs that did not use SVI total scores in their selection processes were unsure of how to incorporate them (36/58, 62%) and wanted additional research on utility (33/58, 57%). More than half of programs indicated being at least somewhat likely to use SVI total scores (55/97; 57%) and videos (52/99; 53%) in the future.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Program reactions on the utility and ease of use of SVI total scores were mixed. Survey results indicate programs used the SVI cautiously in their selection processes, consistent with AAMC recommendations. Future surveys of SVI users will help the AAMC gauge improvements in user acceptance and familiarity with the SVI.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathemed_pp/181
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
00001888_900000000_97647.pdf
Size:
1.495Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is a PDF file of an accepted manuscript that has been accepted for publication and posted with a 12 month embargo and Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.wkopenhealth.com/Institutions.html.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © by the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is a PDF file of an accepted manuscript that has been accepted for publication and posted with a 12 month embargo and Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC) license as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.wkopenhealth.com/Institutions.html.