Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIsbell, Linda M.
dc.contributor.authorBoudreaux, Edwin D
dc.contributor.authorChimowitz, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Guanyu
dc.contributor.authorCyr, Emma
dc.contributor.authorKimball, Ezekiel
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:17.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:49:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:49:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-15
dc.date.submitted2020-02-06
dc.identifier.citation<p>BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan 15. pii: bmjqs-2019-010179. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010179. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010179">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn2044-5415 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010179
dc.identifier.pmid31941799
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/28503
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite calls to study how healthcare providers' emotions may impact patient safety, little research has addressed this topic. The current study aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of emergency department (ED) providers' emotional experiences, including what triggers their emotions, the perceived effects of emotions on clinical decision making and patient care, and strategies providers use to manage their emotions to reduce patient safety risks. METHODS: Employing grounded theory, we conducted 86 semi-structured qualitative interviews with experienced ED providers (45 physicians and 41 nurses) from four academic medical centres and four community hospitals in the Northeastern USA. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop a grounded model of provider emotions and patient safety in the ED. RESULTS: ED providers reported experiencing a wide range of emotions in response to patient, hospital, and system-level factors. Patients triggered both positive and negative emotions; hospital and system-level factors largely triggered negative emotions. Providers expressed awareness of possible adverse effects of negative emotions on clinical decision making, highlighting concerns about patient safety. Providers described strategies they employ to regulate their emotions, including emotional suppression, distraction, and cognitive reappraisal. Many providers believed that these strategies effectively guarded against the risk of emotions negatively influencing their clinical decision making. CONCLUSION: The role of emotions in patient safety is in its early stages and many opportunities exist for researchers, educators, and clinicians to further address this important issue. Our findings highlight the need for future work to (1) determine whether providers' emotion regulation strategies are effective at mitigating patient safety risk, (2) incorporate emotional intelligence training into healthcare education, and (3) shift the cultural norms in medicine to support meaningful discourse around emotions. permissions.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31941799&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010179
dc.subjectdiagnostic errors
dc.subjectemergency department
dc.subjectpatient safety
dc.subjectqualitative research
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.titleWhat do emergency department physicians and nurses feel? A qualitative study of emotions, triggers, regulation strategies, and effects on patient care
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ quality and safety
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/emed_pp/198
dc.identifier.contextkey16469696
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Despite calls to study how healthcare providers' emotions may impact patient safety, little research has addressed this topic. The current study aimed to develop a comprehensive understanding of emergency department (ED) providers' emotional experiences, including what triggers their emotions, the perceived effects of emotions on clinical decision making and patient care, and strategies providers use to manage their emotions to reduce patient safety risks.</p> <p>METHODS: Employing grounded theory, we conducted 86 semi-structured qualitative interviews with experienced ED providers (45 physicians and 41 nurses) from four academic medical centres and four community hospitals in the Northeastern USA. Constant comparative analysis was used to develop a grounded model of provider emotions and patient safety in the ED.</p> <p>RESULTS: ED providers reported experiencing a wide range of emotions in response to patient, hospital, and system-level factors. Patients triggered both positive and negative emotions; hospital and system-level factors largely triggered negative emotions. Providers expressed awareness of possible adverse effects of negative emotions on clinical decision making, highlighting concerns about patient safety. Providers described strategies they employ to regulate their emotions, including emotional suppression, distraction, and cognitive reappraisal. Many providers believed that these strategies effectively guarded against the risk of emotions negatively influencing their clinical decision making.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The role of emotions in patient safety is in its early stages and many opportunities exist for researchers, educators, and clinicians to further address this important issue. Our findings highlight the need for future work to (1) determine whether providers' emotion regulation strategies are effective at mitigating patient safety risk, (2) incorporate emotional intelligence training into healthcare education, and (3) shift the cultural norms in medicine to support meaningful discourse around emotions. permissions.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathemed_pp/198
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record