Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGurwitz, Jerry H.
dc.contributor.authorDuBeau, Catherine E.
dc.contributor.authorMazor, Kathleen M.
dc.contributor.authorSreedhara, Meera
dc.contributor.authorLemay, Celeste A.
dc.contributor.authorSpenard, Ann
dc.contributor.authorPandolfi, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Florence
dc.contributor.authorField, Terry S.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:51:53Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:51:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-01
dc.date.submitted2017-05-22
dc.identifier.citationJ Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2204-2209. Sep 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14464">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgs.14464
dc.identifier.pmid27640341
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29012
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of indwelling urinary catheter use in nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify a diverse sample of 28 Connecticut NHs, defined in terms of ownership, quality ratings, and bed size. PARTICIPANTS: Long-stay (>100 days) residents of study NHs with an indwelling urinary catheter present at any time over a 1-year period. MEASUREMENTS: Duration of catheter use was determined, and indications for catheter placement were documented. Indications considered appropriate included urinary retention or outlet obstruction, pressure ulcer (Stage 3 or 4 with risk of contamination by urine), hospice care, and need for accurate measurement of input and output. During quarterly follow-up assessments, whether the catheter was still in place or had been removed for any reason other than routine maintenance was determined. RESULTS: The overall rate of any urinary catheter use per 100 resident-beds over a 1-year period was 4.8 (range 1.0-9.9, median 5.1). Of the 228 residents meeting eligibility criteria, a documented indication for the catheter was present in the NH record for 195 (86%). Of those with a documented indication, 99% (n = 193) had one or more indications deemed appropriate, including urinary retention (83%), pressure ulcer (21%), hospice care (10%), and need for accurate measurement of input and output (6%). The urinary catheter was removed at some point during the period of observation in 49% (n = 111) of participants; those with a shorter duration of catheter use before study enrollment were more likely to have the catheter removed during the follow-up period. Of the 111 residents who had the catheter removed, 58 (52.3%) had it reinserted at some point during follow-up. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that indwelling urinary catheter use in long-stay NH residents is uncommon and generally appropriate and that efforts to improve catheter care and outcomes should extend beyond a singular focus on reducing use.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27640341&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14464
dc.subjectCAUTI
dc.subjecthealthcare-associated infections
dc.subjectnursing home
dc.subjecturinary catheter
dc.subjectGeriatrics
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleUse of Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Nursing Homes: Implications for Quality Improvement Efforts
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
dc.source.volume64
dc.source.issue11
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/1241
dc.identifier.contextkey10195614
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of indwelling urinary catheter use in nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify a diverse sample of 28 Connecticut NHs, defined in terms of ownership, quality ratings, and bed size.</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Long-stay (>100 days) residents of study NHs with an indwelling urinary catheter present at any time over a 1-year period.</p> <p>MEASUREMENTS: Duration of catheter use was determined, and indications for catheter placement were documented. Indications considered appropriate included urinary retention or outlet obstruction, pressure ulcer (Stage 3 or 4 with risk of contamination by urine), hospice care, and need for accurate measurement of input and output. During quarterly follow-up assessments, whether the catheter was still in place or had been removed for any reason other than routine maintenance was determined.</p> <p>RESULTS: The overall rate of any urinary catheter use per 100 resident-beds over a 1-year period was 4.8 (range 1.0-9.9, median 5.1). Of the 228 residents meeting eligibility criteria, a documented indication for the catheter was present in the NH record for 195 (86%). Of those with a documented indication, 99% (n = 193) had one or more indications deemed appropriate, including urinary retention (83%), pressure ulcer (21%), hospice care (10%), and need for accurate measurement of input and output (6%). The urinary catheter was removed at some point during the period of observation in 49% (n = 111) of participants; those with a shorter duration of catheter use before study enrollment were more likely to have the catheter removed during the follow-up period. Of the 111 residents who had the catheter removed, 58 (52.3%) had it reinserted at some point during follow-up.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that indwelling urinary catheter use in long-stay NH residents is uncommon and generally appropriate and that efforts to improve catheter care and outcomes should extend beyond a singular focus on reducing use.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/1241
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.source.pages2204-2209


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record