Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Nursing Homes: Implications for Quality Improvement Efforts
dc.contributor.author | Gurwitz, Jerry H. | |
dc.contributor.author | DuBeau, Catherine E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mazor, Kathleen M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sreedhara, Meera | |
dc.contributor.author | Lemay, Celeste A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Spenard, Ann | |
dc.contributor.author | Pandolfi, Michelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Florence | |
dc.contributor.author | Field, Terry S. | |
dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:08:20.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T15:51:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T15:51:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11-01 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2017-05-22 | |
dc.identifier.citation | J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2204-2209. Sep 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14464">Link to article on publisher's site</a> | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-8614 (Linking) | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/jgs.14464 | |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27640341 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29012 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of indwelling urinary catheter use in nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify a diverse sample of 28 Connecticut NHs, defined in terms of ownership, quality ratings, and bed size. PARTICIPANTS: Long-stay (>100 days) residents of study NHs with an indwelling urinary catheter present at any time over a 1-year period. MEASUREMENTS: Duration of catheter use was determined, and indications for catheter placement were documented. Indications considered appropriate included urinary retention or outlet obstruction, pressure ulcer (Stage 3 or 4 with risk of contamination by urine), hospice care, and need for accurate measurement of input and output. During quarterly follow-up assessments, whether the catheter was still in place or had been removed for any reason other than routine maintenance was determined. RESULTS: The overall rate of any urinary catheter use per 100 resident-beds over a 1-year period was 4.8 (range 1.0-9.9, median 5.1). Of the 228 residents meeting eligibility criteria, a documented indication for the catheter was present in the NH record for 195 (86%). Of those with a documented indication, 99% (n = 193) had one or more indications deemed appropriate, including urinary retention (83%), pressure ulcer (21%), hospice care (10%), and need for accurate measurement of input and output (6%). The urinary catheter was removed at some point during the period of observation in 49% (n = 111) of participants; those with a shorter duration of catheter use before study enrollment were more likely to have the catheter removed during the follow-up period. Of the 111 residents who had the catheter removed, 58 (52.3%) had it reinserted at some point during follow-up. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that indwelling urinary catheter use in long-stay NH residents is uncommon and generally appropriate and that efforts to improve catheter care and outcomes should extend beyond a singular focus on reducing use. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.relation | <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=27640341&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a> | |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14464 | |
dc.subject | CAUTI | |
dc.subject | healthcare-associated infections | |
dc.subject | nursing home | |
dc.subject | urinary catheter | |
dc.subject | Geriatrics | |
dc.subject | Health Services Administration | |
dc.subject | Health Services Research | |
dc.title | Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters in Nursing Homes: Implications for Quality Improvement Efforts | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | |
dc.source.volume | 64 | |
dc.source.issue | 11 | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/1241 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 10195614 | |
html.description.abstract | <p>OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiology of indwelling urinary catheter use in nursing homes (NHs). DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: A purposeful sampling strategy was used to identify a diverse sample of 28 Connecticut NHs, defined in terms of ownership, quality ratings, and bed size.</p> <p>PARTICIPANTS: Long-stay (>100 days) residents of study NHs with an indwelling urinary catheter present at any time over a 1-year period.</p> <p>MEASUREMENTS: Duration of catheter use was determined, and indications for catheter placement were documented. Indications considered appropriate included urinary retention or outlet obstruction, pressure ulcer (Stage 3 or 4 with risk of contamination by urine), hospice care, and need for accurate measurement of input and output. During quarterly follow-up assessments, whether the catheter was still in place or had been removed for any reason other than routine maintenance was determined.</p> <p>RESULTS: The overall rate of any urinary catheter use per 100 resident-beds over a 1-year period was 4.8 (range 1.0-9.9, median 5.1). Of the 228 residents meeting eligibility criteria, a documented indication for the catheter was present in the NH record for 195 (86%). Of those with a documented indication, 99% (n = 193) had one or more indications deemed appropriate, including urinary retention (83%), pressure ulcer (21%), hospice care (10%), and need for accurate measurement of input and output (6%). The urinary catheter was removed at some point during the period of observation in 49% (n = 111) of participants; those with a shorter duration of catheter use before study enrollment were more likely to have the catheter removed during the follow-up period. Of the 111 residents who had the catheter removed, 58 (52.3%) had it reinserted at some point during follow-up.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that indwelling urinary catheter use in long-stay NH residents is uncommon and generally appropriate and that efforts to improve catheter care and outcomes should extend beyond a singular focus on reducing use.</p> | |
dc.identifier.submissionpath | faculty_pubs/1241 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine | |
dc.contributor.department | Meyers Primary Care Institute | |
dc.source.pages | 2204-2209 |