Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobinson, William P.
dc.contributor.authorLoretz, Lorraine
dc.contributor.authorHanesian, Colleen
dc.contributor.authorFlahive, Julie
dc.contributor.authorBostrom, John
dc.contributor.authorLunig, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorSchanzer, Andres
dc.contributor.authorMessina, Louis M.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:52:16Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:52:16Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-11
dc.date.submitted2017-06-23
dc.identifier.citationJ Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr 11. pii: S0741-5214(17)30375-0. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.063. [Epub ahead of print] <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.063">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0741-5214 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.063
dc.identifier.pmid28410924
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29101
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) system aims to stratify threatened limbs according to their anticipated natural history and estimate the likelihood of benefit from revascularization, but whether it accurately stratifies outcomes in limbs undergoing aggressive treatment for limb salvage is unknown. We investigated whether the WIfI stage correlated with the intensity of limb treatment required and patient-centered outcomes. METHODS: We stratified limbs from a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients referred to a limb preservation center according to WIfI stage (October 2013-May 2015). Comorbidities, multimodal limb treatment, including foot operations and revascularization, and patient-centered outcomes (wound healing, limb salvage, amputation-free survival, maintenance of ambulatory and independent living status, and mortality) were compared among WIfI stages. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of wound healing and limb salvage. RESULTS: We identified 280 threatened limbs encompassing all WIfI stages in 257 consecutive patients: stage 1, 48 (17%); stage 2, 67 (24%); stage 3, 64 (23%); stage 4, 83 (30%); and stage 5 (unsalvageable), 18 (6%). Operative foot debridement, minor amputation, and use of revascularization increased with increasing WIfI stage (P CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated aggressively for limb salvage, WIfI stage correlated with intensity of multimodal limb treatment and with limb salvage and patient-centered outcomes at 1 year. Revascularization improved limb salvage in severe ischemia. These data support the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI system as a powerful tool to risk-stratify patients with threatened limbs and guide treatment.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=28410924&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.063
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleSociety for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) score correlates with the intensity of multimodal limb treatment and patient-centered outcomes in patients with threatened limbs managed in a limb preservation center
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of vascular surgery
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/1329
dc.identifier.contextkey10343905
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection (WIfI) system aims to stratify threatened limbs according to their anticipated natural history and estimate the likelihood of benefit from revascularization, but whether it accurately stratifies outcomes in limbs undergoing aggressive treatment for limb salvage is unknown. We investigated whether the WIfI stage correlated with the intensity of limb treatment required and patient-centered outcomes.</p> <p>METHODS: We stratified limbs from a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients referred to a limb preservation center according to WIfI stage (October 2013-May 2015). Comorbidities, multimodal limb treatment, including foot operations and revascularization, and patient-centered outcomes (wound healing, limb salvage, amputation-free survival, maintenance of ambulatory and independent living status, and mortality) were compared among WIfI stages. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of wound healing and limb salvage.</p> <p>RESULTS: We identified 280 threatened limbs encompassing all WIfI stages in 257 consecutive patients: stage 1, 48 (17%); stage 2, 67 (24%); stage 3, 64 (23%); stage 4, 83 (30%); and stage 5 (unsalvageable), 18 (6%). Operative foot debridement, minor amputation, and use of revascularization increased with increasing WIfI stage (P</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated aggressively for limb salvage, WIfI stage correlated with intensity of multimodal limb treatment and with limb salvage and patient-centered outcomes at 1 year. Revascularization improved limb salvage in severe ischemia. These data support the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI system as a powerful tool to risk-stratify patients with threatened limbs and guide treatment.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/1329
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Outcomes Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record