Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of Psychiatry, Center for Mental Health Services ResearchDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2013-07-01Keywords
ManiaBipolar
Arrest
Risk factors
Cross-validation
Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
Health Services Research
Mental and Social Health
Mental Disorders
Psychiatric and Mental Health
Psychiatry
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: Criminal justice problems among those with bipolar disorder lead to disruption in social functioning, treatment, and recovery. Understanding factors that contribute to arrest during episodes of illness can help inform approaches to risk management and improve clinical care. METHODS: Data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a longitudinal, nationally representative survey conducted in two waves were used to identify factors that predicted inter-wave criminal justice involvement during bipolar I manic episodes. RESULTS: Over 10% of respondents experienced legal involvement during their most severe manic episode. Risk was found in a range of historical, clinical, and contextual factors. Multivariate analyses suggest risk is particularly high for those who are unemployed, non-white, have past juvenile detention, have a prior arrest (while using substances or when manic), used an illicit drug in the past year, and whose mania is characterized by both social and occupational impairment. Legal problems were particularly elevated among those who lacked health insurance while experiencing both social and occupational impairment. LIMITATIONS: Respondents did not include prisoners and hospital inpatients; criminal justice problems were only assessed with regard to the most severe manic episode. CONCLUSIONS: The particular array of factors that elevate the risk of legal involvement during manic episodes offers guidance when identifying prevention strategies and evaluating patients in clinical and forensic settings. Reducing such involvement will require that these issues be dealt with in the broader context of mental health and other services, which in turn necessitates providing adequate access to healthcare.Source
J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.015. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.015Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29228PubMed ID
23477847Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.015