Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMullin, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorStenger, Joseph
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:23.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:53:31Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:53:31Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.date.submitted2013-07-09
dc.identifier.citation<p>Fam Syst Health. 2013 Mar;31(1):69-74. doi: 10.1037/a0031860. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031860">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1091-7527 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/a0031860
dc.identifier.pmid23566130
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29370
dc.description.abstractIntegrated primary care is particularly valuable to rural communities. Behavioral health care is often in short supply, and small or close-knit communities can intensify the stigma of seeking specialty mental health in rural settings. These and other barriers result in reduced access to needed behavioral health care. Nonetheless, rural practice of integrated primary care presents unique challenges to practitioners of multiple disciplines, including issues of competence, confidentiality, and dual relationships. This article provides an illustrative vignette to describe ethical issues in the rural practice of integrated primary care. It will review discipline-specific guidance in approaching these challenges and will offer recommendations for addressing disparities in the approaches of various disciplines engaged in the practice of integrated primary care.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23566130&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://insights.ovid.com/famse/201303110/00124787-201303110-00009
dc.subjectPrimary Health Care
dc.subjectEthics, Medical
dc.subjectintegrated primary care
dc.subjectcollaborative care
dc.subjectrural
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectBioethics and Medical Ethics
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleEthical matters in rural integrated primary care settings
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleFamilies, systems and health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare
dc.source.volume31
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/160
dc.identifier.contextkey4297370
html.description.abstract<p>Integrated primary care is particularly valuable to rural communities. Behavioral health care is often in short supply, and small or close-knit communities can intensify the stigma of seeking specialty mental health in rural settings. These and other barriers result in reduced access to needed behavioral health care. Nonetheless, rural practice of integrated primary care presents unique challenges to practitioners of multiple disciplines, including issues of competence, confidentiality, and dual relationships. This article provides an illustrative vignette to describe ethical issues in the rural practice of integrated primary care. It will review discipline-specific guidance in approaching these challenges and will offer recommendations for addressing disparities in the approaches of various disciplines engaged in the practice of integrated primary care.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/160
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Integrated Primary Care
dc.source.pages69-74


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record