• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingAccessibilityTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Assuring Integrity in the Residency Match Process

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Assuring_Integrity_in_the_Resi ...
    Size:
    908.9Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Authors
    Chimienti, Sonia N.
    DeMarco, Deborah M.
    Flotte, Terence R.
    Collins, Michael F.
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Office of Educational Affairs
    Department of Quantitative Health Sciences
    Department of Pediatrics
    Department of Medicine
    School of Medicine
    Document Type
    Accepted Manuscript
    Publication Date
    2018-11-13
    Keywords
    medical students
    residency matching process
    ethics
    integrity
    Bioethics and Medical Ethics
    Medical Education
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Integrity in medicine is essential. One of the most important competencies a medical student can master is to be honest at all times. Indeed, professionalism is a key competency in the identity formation and development of a medical student. At times, this competency becomes challenged during the resident matching process. The behavior of some students, faculty members, and program directors who participate in the residency program selection process (the Match) often falls short of this ideal when it comes to handling the process that will be most dispositive in directing the future careers of graduating medical students. Violations of both National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) rules and ethical norms have been reported in the literature and experienced by students. In this Invited Commentary, the authors recommend a series of reforms. Substantially more robust enforcement of NRMP rules should be considered, including the creation of an avenue for anonymous reporting by applicants who experience inappropriate pre-Match, post-interview communications.
    Source

    Acad Med. 2018 Nov 13. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002531. [Epub ahead of print] Link to article on publisher's site

    DOI
    10.1097/ACM.0000000000002531
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29376
    PubMed ID
    30431456
    Related Resources

    Link to article in PubMed

    Rights
    Copyright © 2018 by the Association of American Medical Colleges. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Academic Medicine. Accepted manuscript posted after 12 months as allowed by the publisher's copyright transfer agreement at http://edmgr.ovid.com/acadmed/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf.
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1097/ACM.0000000000002531
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    T.H. Chan School of Medicine Student Publications
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.