Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSingh, Sonal
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Thomas J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:24.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:53:58Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-26
dc.date.submitted2020-05-28
dc.identifier.citation<p>medRxiv 2020.05.19.20106906; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20106906. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20106906" target="_blank">Link to preprint on medRxiv service</a></p>
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2020.05.19.20106906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29460
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are widely used to treat hospitalized COVID-19 patients primarily based on antiviral activity in in vitro studies. Our objective was to systematically evaluate their efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Medrxviv for studies of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 hospitalized patients on April 26, 2020. We evaluated the quality of trials and observational studies using the Jadad criteria and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively. RESULTS: After a review of 175 citations, we included 5 clinical trials (total of 345 patients), 9 observational studies (n = 2529), and 6 additional studies (n = 775) reporting on the QT interval. Three studies reported treatment benefits including two studies reporting benefit on virologic outcomes, which was statistically significant in one study, and another reported significant improvement on cough symptoms. Three studies reported that treatment was potentially harmful, including an significantly increased risk of mortality in two studies and increased need for respiratory support in another. Eight studies were unable to detect improvements on virologic outcomes (n = 3) or pneumonia or transfer to ICU/death (n = 5). The proportion of participants with critical QTc intervals of ≥ 500 ms or an increase of ≥ 60 ms from baseline ranged from 8.3% to 36% (n = 8). One clinical trial and six observational studies were of good quality. The remaining studies were of poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review of reported clinical studies did not identify substantial evidence to support the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and raises questions about potential harm from QT prolongation and increased mortality.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.19.20106906
dc.rightsThe copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder.
dc.subjectHydroxychloroquine
dc.subjectchloroquine
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectsafety
dc.subjectefficacy
dc.subjectsystematic review
dc.subjectinfectious disease
dc.subjectClinical Trials
dc.subjectImmunology and Infectious Disease
dc.subjectInfectious Disease
dc.subjectPatient Safety
dc.subjectVirology
dc.subjectVirus Diseases
dc.titleEfficacy and Safety of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine for COVID-19: A systematic review [preprint]
dc.typePreprint
dc.source.journaltitlemedRxiv
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2693&amp;context=faculty_pubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/1685
dc.identifier.contextkey17888475
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:53:59Z
html.description.abstract<p><p id="x-x-x-x-x-p-2">BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are widely used to treat hospitalized COVID-19 patients primarily based on antiviral activity in in vitro studies. Our objective was to systematically evaluate their efficacy and safety in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.</p> <p>METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Medrxviv for studies of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19 hospitalized patients on April 26, 2020. We evaluated the quality of trials and observational studies using the Jadad criteria and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, respectively.</p> <p>RESULTS: After a review of 175 citations, we included 5 clinical trials (total of 345 patients), 9 observational studies (n = 2529), and 6 additional studies (n = 775) reporting on the QT interval. Three studies reported treatment benefits including two studies reporting benefit on virologic outcomes, which was statistically significant in one study, and another reported significant improvement on cough symptoms. Three studies reported that treatment was potentially harmful, including an significantly increased risk of mortality in two studies and increased need for respiratory support in another. Eight studies were unable to detect improvements on virologic outcomes (n = 3) or pneumonia or transfer to ICU/death (n = 5). The proportion of participants with critical QTc intervals of ≥ 500 ms or an increase of ≥ 60 ms from baseline ranged from 8.3% to 36% (n = 8). One clinical trial and six observational studies were of good quality. The remaining studies were of poor quality.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review of reported clinical studies did not identify substantial evidence to support the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and raises questions about potential harm from QT prolongation and increased mortality.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/1685
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2020.05.19.20106906v1.full.pdf
Size:
603.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record