The Incidence of Node-Positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sublobar Resection and the Role of Radiation in Its Management
Authors
Varlotto, John M.Martins Emmerick, Isabel Cristina
Maddox, Debra
Herbert, Christine
Griffin, Molly
Rava, Paul
Fitzgerald, Thomas J.
Oliveira, Paulo
Baima, Jennifer
Sood, Rahul N.
Walsh, William
McIntosh, Lacey J.
Lou, Feiran
Maxfield, Mark W.
Faculty Advisor
John VarlottoUMass Chan Affiliations
Department of RadiologyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine
Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center
Division of Thoracic Surgery
Department of Radiation Oncology
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2020-05-26Keywords
incidencelung cancer
node positive
radiation
sub-lobar resection (SLR)
Diagnosis
Disease Modeling
Neoplasms
Oncology
Radiology
Respiratory Tract Diseases
Surgery
Surgical Procedures, Operative
Therapeutics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Purpose: To identify the incidence, preoperative risk factors, and prognosis associated with pathologically positive lymph node (pN+) in patients undergoing a sub-lobar resection (SLR). Methods: This is a retrospective study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014 analyzing SLR excluding those with any preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiation, follow-up < 3 months, stage IV disease, or > 1 tumor nodule. Multivariable modeling (MVA) was used to determine factors associated with overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to determine preoperative risk factors for pN+ in patients having at least one node examined to assess radiation's effect on OS in those patients with pN+ and to determine whether SLR was associated with inferior OS as compared to lobectomy for each nodal stage. Results: A total of 40,202 patients underwent SLR, but only 58.3% had one lymph node examined. Then, 2,615 individuals had pN+ which decreased progressively from 15.1% in 2004 to 8.9% in 2014 (N1, from 6.3 to 3.0%, and N2, from 8.4 to 5.9%). A lower risk of pN+ was noted for squamous cell carcinomas, bronchioloalveolar adenocarcinoma (BAC), adenocarcinomas, and right upper lobe locations. In the pN+ group, OS was worse without chemotherapy or radiation. Radiation was associated with a strong trend for OS in the entire pN+ group (p = 0.0647) which was largely due to the effects on those having N2 disease (p = 0.009) or R1 resections (p = 0.03), but not N1 involvement (p = 0.87). PSM noted that SLR was associated with an inferior OS as compared to lobectomy by nodal stage in the overall patient population and even for those with tumors < 2 cm. Conclusion: pN+ incidence in SLRs has decreased over time. SLR was associated with inferior OS as compared to lobectomy by nodal stage. Radiation appears to improve the OS in patients undergoing SLR with pN+, especially in those with N2 nodal involvement and/or positive margins.Source
Varlotto JM, Emmerick I, Voland R, DeCamp MM, Flickinger JC, Maddox DJ, Herbert C, Griffin M, Rava P, Fitzgerald TJ, Oliveira P, Baima J, Sood R, Walsh W, McIntosh LJ, Lou F, Maxfield M, Rassaei N, Uy K. The Incidence of Node-Positive Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing Sublobar Resection and the Role of Radiation in Its Management. Front Oncol. 2020 May 26;10:417. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00417. PMID: 32528866; PMCID: PMC7264374. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.3389/fonc.2020.00417Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29491PubMed ID
32528866Notes
Molly Griffin participated in this study as a medical student in the Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.
Related Resources
Rights
Copyright © 2020 Varlotto, Emmerick, Voland, DeCamp, Flickinger, Maddox, Herbert, Griffin, Rava, Fitzgerald, Oliveira, Baima, Sood, Walsh, McIntosh, Lou, Maxfield, Rassaei and Uy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fonc.2020.00417
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright © 2020 Varlotto, Emmerick, Voland, DeCamp, Flickinger, Maddox, Herbert, Griffin, Rava, Fitzgerald, Oliveira, Baima, Sood, Walsh, McIntosh, Lou, Maxfield, Rassaei and Uy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.