Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRai, Balaj
dc.contributor.authorTennyson, Joseph C.
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, R. Trevor
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:26.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:55:11Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:55:11Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-22
dc.date.submitted2021-02-05
dc.identifier.citation<p>Rai B, Tennyson J, Marshall RT. Retrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls. West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 22;21(3):665-670. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943. PMID: 32421517; PMCID: PMC7234714. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn1936-900X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.5811/westjem.2020.1.44943
dc.identifier.pmid32421517
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29699
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of reasons for contacting OLMD. OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to describe the quantity of and reasons for calls for medical direction. We also sought to determine time diverted from emergency physicians due to OLMD. Finally, we hoped to identify any areas for potential improvement or additional training opportunities for EMS providers. METHODS: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data analysis of recorded OLMD calls from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Data were extracted by research personnel listening to audio recordings and were entered into a database for descriptive analysis. We abstracted the date and length of call, patient demographic information (age and gender), category of call (trauma, medical, cardiac, or obstetrics), reason for call, and origin of call (prehospital, interhospital, nursing home, or discharge). RESULTS: The total number of recordings analyzed was 519. Calls were divided into four categories pertaining to their nature: 353 (68.5%) medical; 70 (13.6%) trauma; 83 (16.1%) cardiac; and 9 (8%) were obstetrics related. Repeat calls regarding the same patient encounter comprised 48 (9.4%) of the calls. Patient refusal of transport was the most common reason for a call medical direction (32.3% of calls). The total time for medical direction calls for the year was 26.6 hours. The maximum number of calls in a single day was seven, with a mean of 2.04 calls per day (standard deviation [SD] +/- 1.18). The mean call length was 3.06 minutes (SD +/- 2.51). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the use of OLMD frequently involves complex decision-making such as determination of the medical decision-making capacity of patients to refuse treatment and transport, and evaluation of the appropriate level of care for interfacility transfers. Further investigation into the effect of EMS physician-driven medical direction on both the quality and time required for OLMD could allow for better identification of areas of potential improvement and training.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=32421517&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.rightsCopyright : © 2020 Rai et al. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectemergency medical services
dc.subjectEMS
dc.subjectonline medical direction
dc.subjectprotocol-based care
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.titleRetrospective Analysis of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physician Medical Control Calls
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe western journal of emergency medicine
dc.source.volume21
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2930&amp;context=faculty_pubs&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/1911
dc.identifier.contextkey21482671
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T15:55:11Z
html.description.abstract<p>INTRODUCTION: Although emergency medical services (EMS) standing-order protocols provide more efficient and accurate on-scene management by paramedics, online medical direction (OLMD) has not been eliminated from practice. In this modern era of OLMD, no studies exist to describe the prevalence of reasons for contacting OLMD.</p> <p>OBJECTIVES: The primary goal of this study was to describe the quantity of and reasons for calls for medical direction. We also sought to determine time diverted from emergency physicians due to OLMD. Finally, we hoped to identify any areas for potential improvement or additional training opportunities for EMS providers.</p> <p>METHODS: This was a descriptive study with retrospective data analysis of recorded OLMD calls from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. Data were extracted by research personnel listening to audio recordings and were entered into a database for descriptive analysis. We abstracted the date and length of call, patient demographic information (age and gender), category of call (trauma, medical, cardiac, or obstetrics), reason for call, and origin of call (prehospital, interhospital, nursing home, or discharge).</p> <p>RESULTS: The total number of recordings analyzed was 519. Calls were divided into four categories pertaining to their nature: 353 (68.5%) medical; 70 (13.6%) trauma; 83 (16.1%) cardiac; and 9 (8%) were obstetrics related. Repeat calls regarding the same patient encounter comprised 48 (9.4%) of the calls. Patient refusal of transport was the most common reason for a call medical direction (32.3% of calls). The total time for medical direction calls for the year was 26.6 hours. The maximum number of calls in a single day was seven, with a mean of 2.04 calls per day (standard deviation [SD] +/- 1.18). The mean call length was 3.06 minutes (SD +/- 2.51).</p> <p>CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the use of OLMD frequently involves complex decision-making such as determination of the medical decision-making capacity of patients to refuse treatment and transport, and evaluation of the appropriate level of care for interfacility transfers. Further investigation into the effect of EMS physician-driven medical direction on both the quality and time required for OLMD could allow for better identification of areas of potential improvement and training.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/1911
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Emergency Medicine
dc.source.pages665-670


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
eScholarship_UC_item_91x7249p.pdf
Size:
694.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright : © 2020 Rai et al. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright : © 2020 Rai et al. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/