Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Andrew H
dc.contributor.authorClayton, Amy C.
dc.contributor.authorBentz, Joel S.
dc.contributor.authorWasserman, Patricia G.
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Michael R.
dc.contributor.authorSouers, Rhona J.
dc.contributor.authorMoriarty, Ann T.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:28.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:56:12Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:56:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.date.submitted2013-07-25
dc.identifier.citationAndrew H. Fischer, Amy C. Clayton, Joel S. Bentz, Patricia G. Wasserman, Michael R. Henry, Rhona J. Souers, and Ann T. Moriarty (2013) Performance Differences Between Conventional Smears and Liquid-Based Preparations of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Samples: Analysis of 47 076 Responses in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine: January 2013, Vol. 137, No. 1, pp. 26-31. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0003-9985 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP
dc.identifier.pmid23276172
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/29916
dc.description.abstractCONTEXT: Controversy exists about whether thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) should be processed with conventional smears or liquid-based preparations (LBPs). OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of conventional smears to LBPs for thyroid FNA slides circulated in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology. DESIGN: Participant responses for thyroid FNA slides were compared with the reference diagnosis at the level of 3 general diagnostic categories: negative, suspicious (which included only follicular and Hurthle cell neoplasm), and malignant. For specific reference diagnoses of benign/goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma, the participants' specific diagnoses were analyzed and poorly performing slides were rereviewed. RESULTS: The 47, 076 thyroid FNA slide responses, between 2001 and 2009, included 44, 478 responses (94%) for conventional smears and 2598 responses (6%) for LBPs. For the general reference category negative, participant responses were discrepant in 14.9% of conventional smears compared with 5.9% for LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of benign/goiter was misdiagnosed as a follicular neoplasm in 7.8% of conventional smears, compared with 1.3% of LBP. For the general reference category of malignant, participant responses were discrepant in 7.3% of conventional smears compared with 14.7% of LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma was misdiagnosed as benign/goiter in 7.2% of LBPs, compared with 4.8% of conventional smears (p <.001). CONCLUSIONS: LBPs performed worse than conventional smears for cases with a reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, LBPs performed better than conventional smears for cases with a benign reference diagnosis. Specific features in thyroid FNAs that may improve the diagnostic accuracy of LBPs and conventional smears are described.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23276172&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0009-CP
dc.subjectBiopsy, Fine-Needle
dc.subjectCarcinoma, Papillary
dc.subjectDiagnostic Errors
dc.subjectGoiter
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectPathology, Surgical
dc.subjectSocieties, Medical
dc.subjectThyroid Diseases
dc.subjectThyroid Gland
dc.subjectThyroid Neoplasms
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectPathology
dc.titlePerformance differences between conventional smears and liquid-based preparations of thyroid fine-needle aspiration samples: analysis of 47,076 responses in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleArchives of pathology and laboratory medicine
dc.source.volume137
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/212
dc.identifier.contextkey4349489
html.description.abstract<p>CONTEXT: Controversy exists about whether thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) should be processed with conventional smears or liquid-based preparations (LBPs).</p> <p>OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of conventional smears to LBPs for thyroid FNA slides circulated in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Non-Gynecologic Cytology.</p> <p>DESIGN: Participant responses for thyroid FNA slides were compared with the reference diagnosis at the level of 3 general diagnostic categories: negative, suspicious (which included only follicular and Hurthle cell neoplasm), and malignant. For specific reference diagnoses of benign/goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma, the participants' specific diagnoses were analyzed and poorly performing slides were rereviewed.</p> <p>RESULTS: The 47, 076 thyroid FNA slide responses, between 2001 and 2009, included 44, 478 responses (94%) for conventional smears and 2598 responses (6%) for LBPs. For the general reference category negative, participant responses were discrepant in 14.9% of conventional smears compared with 5.9% for LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of benign/goiter was misdiagnosed as a follicular neoplasm in 7.8% of conventional smears, compared with 1.3% of LBP. For the general reference category of malignant, participant responses were discrepant in 7.3% of conventional smears compared with 14.7% of LBPs (P < .001). The specific reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma was misdiagnosed as benign/goiter in 7.2% of LBPs, compared with 4.8% of conventional smears (p <.001).</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: LBPs performed worse than conventional smears for cases with a reference diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. However, LBPs performed better than conventional smears for cases with a benign reference diagnosis. Specific features in thyroid FNAs that may improve the diagnostic accuracy of LBPs and conventional smears are described.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/212
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pathology
dc.source.pages26-31


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record