Prenatal oral health education in U.S. dental schools and obstetrics and gynecology residencies
UMass Chan AffiliationsSenior Scholars Program
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health
Document TypeJournal Article
Education, Dental, Graduate
Health Care Surveys
Health Education, Dental
Internship and Residency
Oral health education
Obstetrics and gynecology
Dental Public Health and Education
Obstetrics and Gynecology
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractPrenatal oral health (POH) is an important health issue, but dental and obstetrical clinicians are not meeting the oral health needs of pregnant patients. This study evaluates how training contributes to this paradox with a national survey of sixty dental school deans and 240 obstetrics and gynecology residency program directors. Response rates were 53 percent and 40 percent for deans and program directors, respectively. According to the respondents, 94 percent of responding dental schools provided POH education, only 39 percent of responding residencies taught POH, and 65 percent of responding deans and 45 percent of responding program directors were aware of current POH guidelines. The residencies exposing trainees to guidelines were three times more likely to have POH training. Barriers to POH education were reported to include too few pregnant patients in clinical settings (for responding dental schools) and lack of faculty expertise (for responding residencies). The majority of responding deans and program directors agreed they would add more POH education if the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a policy statement or practice bulletin. The majority of responding dental deans reported teaching POH in their schools, but clinical exposure was limited; less than half of responding residencies included POH training. Future efforts should include distribution of POH guidelines/consensus statements to educators and learners, increasing exposure of dental students to pregnant patients, and developing faculty expertise in residencies.
SourceCurtis M, Silk HJ, Savageau JA. Prenatal oral health education in U.S. dental schools and obstetrics and gynecology residencies. J Dent Educ. 2013 Nov;77(11):1461-8. Link to article on publisher's website
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30067
Megan (Weeks) Curtis participated in this study as a medical student in the 2013 Senior Scholars research program at the University of Massachusetts Medical School.
Related ResourcesLink to article in PubMed
RightsPublisher PDF posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.jdentaled.org/site/misc/Reprint_policy.xhtml.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Dental case manager encounters: the association with retention in dental care and treatment plan completionLemay, Celeste A.; Tobias, Carol; Umez-Eronini, Amarachi A.; Brown, Carolyn J.; McCluskey, Amanda; Fox, Jane E.; Bednarsh, Helene; Cabral, Howard J. (2013-03-01)Little is known about dental case managers as few programs have been scientifically evaluated. The goal of this study was to explore the impact of dental case manager on retention in dental care and completion of treatment plans, while specifically exploring the number of dental case manager encounters. Fourteen programs enrolled people with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in dental care and a longitudinal study between 2007 and 2009. The 758 participants had a total of 2715 encounters with a dental case manager over twelve months: 29% had a single encounter; 21% had two; 27% had 3-4 and; 23% had 5-29 encounters. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, participants receiving more encounters were significantly more likely to complete their Phase 1 treatment plan, be retained in dental care, and experience improvements in overall oral health status. Organizations considering efforts to improve the oral health of vulnerable, hard-to-engage populations should consider these findings when planning interventions.
Educating Dental Health Professionals about People with Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesClifford, Christine J.; Bonardi, Alexandra; Holder, Matthew (2015-03-08)Dental schools and dental hygiene programs are required to incorporate specialized training in their programs to serve people with special needs, however people with intellectual and developmental disability (I/DD) continue to experience poor oral health outcomes. Access to clinicians with the desire and skill to care for people with I/DD remains a challenge. There is a need to understand the best approaches to improve access, and to reduce disparity in oral health, for this vulnerable population representing approximately 1-3% of the general population. Researchers are systematically investigating the literature to uncover evidence of effective approaches to improve access and to support good oral health behaviors. These approaches should be integrated into educational curricula.
Who participates in web-assisted tobacco interventions? The quit-primo and national dental practice-based research network hi-quit studiesSadasivam, Rajani S.; Kinney, Rebecca L.; Delaughter, Kathryn L.; Rao, Sowmya R.; Williams, Jessica Hillman; Coley, Heather L.; Ray, Midge N.; Gilbert, Gregg H.; Allison, Jeroan J.; Ford, Daniel E.; et al. (2013-05-01)INTRODUCTION: Smoking is the most preventable cause of death. Although effective, Web-assisted tobacco interventions are underutilized and recruitment is challenging. Understanding who participates in Web-assisted tobacco interventions may help in improving recruitment. OBJECTIVES: To understand characteristics of smokers participating in a Web-assisted tobacco intervention (Decide2Quit.org). METHODS: In addition to the typical Google advertisements, we expanded Decide2Quit.org recruitment to include referrals from medical and dental providers. We assessed how the expanded recruitment of smokers changed the users' characteristics, including comparison with a population-based sample of smokers from the national Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance Survey (BRFSS). Using a negative binomial regression, we compared demographic and smoking characteristics by recruitment source, in particular readiness to quit and association with subsequent Decide2Quit.org use. RESULTS: The Decide2Quit.org cohort included 605 smokers; the 2010 BRFSS dataset included 69,992. Compared to BRFSS smokers, a higher proportion of Decide2Quit.org smokers were female (65.2% vs 45.7%, P=.001), over age 35 (80.8% vs 67.0%, P=.001), and had some college or were college graduates (65.7% vs 45.9%, P=.001). Demographic and smoking characteristics varied by recruitment; for example, a lower proportion of medical- (22.1%) and dental-referred (18.9%) smokers had set a quit date or had already quit than Google smokers (40.1%, P CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment from clinical practices complimented Google recruitment attracting smokers less motivated to quit and less experienced with Web-assisted tobacco interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00797628; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00797628 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6F3tqz0b3).