Relation between soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I and incident atrial fibrillation
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Authors
Rienstra, MichielYin, Xiaoyan
Larson, Martin G.
Fontes, Joao D.
Magnani, Jared W.
McManus, David D.
McCabe, Elizabeth L.
Coglianese, Erin E.
Amponsah, Michael
Ho, Jennifer E.
Januzzi, James L. Jr.
Wollert, Kai C.
Fradley, Michael G.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Ellinor, Patrick T.
Wang, Thomas J.
Benjamin, Emelia J.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Meyers Primary Care InstituteDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2014-01-01Keywords
AgedAtrial Fibrillation
Biological Markers
C-Reactive Protein
Female
Growth Differentiation Factor 15
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
Proportional Hazards Models
Receptors, Cell Surface
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
UMCCTS funding
Cardiology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether circulating concentrations of soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI) are associated with incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and whether these biomarkers improve current risk prediction models including AF risk factors, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-reactive protein (CRP). METHODS: We studied the relation between soluble ST2, GDF-15, and hsTnI and development of AF in Framingham Heart Study participants without prevalent AF. We used Cox proportional hazard regression analysis to examine the relation of incident AF during a 10-year follow-up period with each biomarker. We adjusted for standard AF clinical risk factors, BNP, and CRP. RESULTS: The mean age of the 3,217 participants was 59 +/- 10 years, and 54% were women. During a 10-year follow-up, 242 participants developed AF. In age- and sex-adjusted models, GDF-15 and hsTnI were associated with risk of incident AF; however, after including the AF risk factors and BNP and CRP, only hsTnI was significantly associated with AF (hazard ratio per 1 SD of loge hsTnI, 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.26, P = .045). The c statistic of the base model including AF risk factors, BNP, and CRP was 0.803 (95% CI 0.777-0.830) and did not improve by adding individual or all 3 biomarkers. None of the discrimination and reclassification statistics were significant compared with the base model. CONCLUSION: In a community-based cohort, circulating hsTnI concentrations were associated with incident AF. None of the novel biomarkers evaluated improved AF risk discrimination or reclassification beyond standard clinical AF risk factors and biomarkers.Source
Rienstra M, Yin X, Larson MG, Fontes JD, Magnani JW, McManus DD, McCabe EL, Coglianese EE, Amponsah M, Ho JE, Januzzi JL Jr, Wollert KC, Fradley MG, Vasan RS, Ellinor PT, Wang TJ, Benjamin EJ. Relation between soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and high-sensitivity troponin I and incident atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2014 Jan;167(1):109-115.e2. doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.003. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.003Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30101PubMed ID
24332149Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.ahj.2013.10.003