Decision-making process for conditions nominated to the recommended uniform screening panel: statement of the US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children
Authors
Kemper, Alex R.Green, Nancy S.
Calonge, Ned
Lam, Wendy K.K.
Comeau, Anne Marie
Goldenberg, Aaron J.
Ojodu, Jelili
Prosser, Lisa A.
Tanksley, Susan
Bocchini, Joseph A. Jr.
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2014-02-01Keywords
*Advisory CommitteesChild
Child, Preschool
*Decision Making
*Evidence-Based Medicine
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Neonatal Screening
United States
*United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Maternal and Child Health
Medical Genetics
Pediatrics
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
PURPOSE: The US Secretary of Health and Human Services provides guidance to state newborn screening programs about which conditions should be included in screening (i.e., the "Recommended Uniform Screening Panel"). This guidance is informed by evidence-based recommendations from the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. This report describes the Advisory Committee's revised decision-making process for considering conditions nominated to the panel. METHODS: An expert panel meeting was held in April 2012 to revise the decision matrix, which helps to guide the recommendation process. In January 2013, the Advisory Committee voted to adopt the revised decision matrix. RESULTS: The revised decision matrix clarifies the approach to rating magnitude and certainty of the net benefit of screening to the population of screened newborns for nominated conditions, and now includes the consideration of the capability of state newborn screening programs for population-wide implementation by evaluating the feasibility and readiness of states to adopt screening for nominated conditions. CONCLUSION: The revised decision matrix will bring increased quality, transparency, and consistency to the process of modifying the recommended uniform screening panel and will now allow formal evaluation of the challenges that state newborn screening programs face in adopting screening for new conditions.Source
Genet Med. 2014 Feb;16(2):183-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.98. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1038/gim.2013.98Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30249PubMed ID
23907646Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/gim.2013.98