Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMuralidharan, Sujatha
dc.contributor.authorMandrekar, Pranoti
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:30.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:57:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:57:40Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01
dc.date.submitted2015-01-15
dc.identifier.citationJ Leukoc Biol. 2013 Dec;94(6):1167-84. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0313153. Epub 2013 Aug 29. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0313153">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0741-5400 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1189/jlb.0313153
dc.identifier.pmid23990626
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30254
dc.description.abstractExtensive research in the past decade has identified innate immune recognition receptors and intracellular signaling pathways that culminate in inflammatory responses. Besides its role in cytoprotection, the importance of cell stress in inflammation and host defense against pathogens is emerging. Recent studies have shown that proteins in cellular stress responses, including the heat shock response, ER stress response, and DNA damage response, interact with and regulate signaling intermediates involved in the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The effect of such regulation by cell stress proteins may dictate the inflammatory profile of the immune response during infection and disease. In this review, we describe the regulation of innate immune cell activation by cell stress pathways, present detailed descriptions of the types of stress response proteins and their crosstalk with immune signaling intermediates that are essential in host defense, and illustrate the relevance of these interactions in diseases characteristic of aberrant immune responses, such as chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. Understanding the crosstalk between cellular stress proteins and immune signaling may have translational implications for designing more effective regimens to treat immune disorders.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23990626&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3828604/
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subject*DNA Damage
dc.subjectEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress
dc.subjectHeat-Shock Response
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subject*Immunity, Innate
dc.subjectInflammation
dc.subjectSignal Transduction
dc.subjectCellular and Molecular Physiology
dc.subjectImmunity
dc.titleCellular stress response and innate immune signaling: integrating pathways in host defense and inflammation
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of leukocyte biology
dc.source.volume94
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/506
dc.identifier.contextkey6532230
html.description.abstract<p>Extensive research in the past decade has identified innate immune recognition receptors and intracellular signaling pathways that culminate in inflammatory responses. Besides its role in cytoprotection, the importance of cell stress in inflammation and host defense against pathogens is emerging. Recent studies have shown that proteins in cellular stress responses, including the heat shock response, ER stress response, and DNA damage response, interact with and regulate signaling intermediates involved in the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. The effect of such regulation by cell stress proteins may dictate the inflammatory profile of the immune response during infection and disease. In this review, we describe the regulation of innate immune cell activation by cell stress pathways, present detailed descriptions of the types of stress response proteins and their crosstalk with immune signaling intermediates that are essential in host defense, and illustrate the relevance of these interactions in diseases characteristic of aberrant immune responses, such as chronic inflammatory diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. Understanding the crosstalk between cellular stress proteins and immune signaling may have translational implications for designing more effective regimens to treat immune disorders.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/506
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology
dc.source.pages1167-84


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record