Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with acute ischemic stroke: results of the AX200 for Ischemic Stroke trial
Authors
Ringelstein, E. BerndThijs, Vincent
Norrving, Bo
Chamorro, Angel
Aichner, Franz
Grond, Martin
Saver, Jeff
Laage, Rico
Schneider, Armin
Rathgeb, Frank
Vogt, Gerhard
Charisse, Gabriele
Fiebach, Jochen B.
Schwab, Stefan
Schabitz, Wolf R.
Kollmar, Rainer
Fisher, Marc
Brozman, Miroslav
Skoloudik, David
Gruber, Franz
Serena Leal, Joaquin
Veltkamp, Roland
Kohrmann, Martin
Berrouschot, Jorg
UMass Chan Affiliations
Department of NeurologyDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2013-10-01Keywords
AdolescentAdult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
*Brain Infarction
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Female
*Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
effects
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Recombinant Proteins
*Stroke
Time Factors
Cardiovascular Diseases
Neurology
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; AX200; Filgrastim) is a stroke drug candidate with excellent preclinical evidence for efficacy. A previous phase IIa dose-escalation study suggested potential efficacy in humans. The present large phase IIb trial was powered to detect clinical efficacy in acute ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: G-CSF (135 microg/kg body weight intravenous over 72 hours) was tested against placebo in 328 patients in a multinational, multicenter, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial (NCT00927836; www.clinicaltrial.gov). Main inclusion criteria were /=15 mL. Primary and secondary end points were the modified Rankin scale score and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at day 90, respectively. Data were analyzed using a prespecified model that adjusted for age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline, and initial infarct volume (diffusion-weighted imaging). RESULTS: G-CSF treatment failed to meet the primary and secondary end points of the trial. For additional end points such as mortality, Barthel index, or infarct size at day 30, G-CSF did not show efficacy either. There was, however, a trend for reduced infarct growth in the G-CSF group. G-CSF showed the expected peripheral pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, with a strong increase in leukocytes and monocytes. In parallel, the cytokine profile showed a significant decrease of interleukin-1. CONCLUSIONS: G-CSF, a novel and promising drug candidate with a comprehensive preclinical and clinical package, did not provide any significant benefit with respect to either clinical outcome or imaging biomarkers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00927836.Source
Stroke. 2013 Oct;44(10):2681-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001531. Epub 2013 Aug 20. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001531Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30270PubMed ID
23963331Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001531