Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Virginia P.
dc.contributor.authorMassion, Ann O.
dc.contributor.authorClemow, Lynn
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorDruker, Susan
dc.contributor.authorHebert, James R.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:31.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:57:55Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:57:55Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-01
dc.date.submitted2015-03-24
dc.identifier.citationIntegr Cancer Ther. 2013 Sep;12(5):404-13. doi: 10.1177/1534735412473640. Epub 2013 Jan 28. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735412473640">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1534-7354 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1534735412473640
dc.identifier.pmid23362338
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30311
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To testthe relative effectiveness of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program (MBSR) compared with a nutrition education intervention (NEP) and usual care (UC) in women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer (BrCA)undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: Datawere available from a randomized controlled trialof 172 women, 20 to 65 years old, with stage I or II BrCA. Data from women completing the 8-week MBSR program plus 3 additional sessions focuses on special needs associated with BrCA were compared to women receiving attention control NEP and UC. Follow-up was performed at 3 post-intervention points: 4 months, and 1 and 2 years. Standardized, validated self-administered questionnaires were used to assess psychosocial variables. Descriptive analyses compared women by randomization assignment. Regression analyses, incorporating both intention-to-treat and post hoc multivariable approaches, were used to control for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A subset of 120 women underwent radiotherapy; 77 completed treatment prior to the study, and 40 had radiotherapy during the MBSR intervention. Women who actively received radiotherapy (art) while participating in the MBSR intervention (MBSR-art) experienced a significant (P < .05) improvement in 16 psychosocial variables compared with the NEP-art, UC-art, or both at 4 months. These included health-related, BrCA-specific quality of life and psychosocial coping, which were the primary outcomes, and secondary measures, including meaningfulness, helplessness, cognitive avoidance, depression, paranoid ideation, hostility, anxiety, global severity, anxious preoccupation, and emotional control. CONCLUSIONS: MBSR appears to facilitate psychosocial adjustment in BrCA patients receiving radiotherapy, suggesting applicability for MBSR as adjunctive therapy in oncological practice.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=23362338&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758444/
dc.subjectAdaptation, Psychological
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectCombined Modality Therapy
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMindfulness
dc.subjectNeoplasm Staging
dc.subjectNutrition Therapy
dc.subjectPatient Education as Topic
dc.subjectRadiotherapy
dc.subjectStress, Psychological
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectAlternative and Complementary Medicine
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.subjectWomen's Health
dc.titleA randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction for women with early-stage breast cancer receiving radiotherapy
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleIntegrative cancer therapies
dc.source.volume12
dc.source.issue5
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/573
dc.identifier.contextkey6889236
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: To testthe relative effectiveness of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program (MBSR) compared with a nutrition education intervention (NEP) and usual care (UC) in women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer (BrCA)undergoing radiotherapy.</p> <p>METHODS: Datawere available from a randomized controlled trialof 172 women, 20 to 65 years old, with stage I or II BrCA. Data from women completing the 8-week MBSR program plus 3 additional sessions focuses on special needs associated with BrCA were compared to women receiving attention control NEP and UC. Follow-up was performed at 3 post-intervention points: 4 months, and 1 and 2 years. Standardized, validated self-administered questionnaires were used to assess psychosocial variables. Descriptive analyses compared women by randomization assignment. Regression analyses, incorporating both intention-to-treat and post hoc multivariable approaches, were used to control for potential confounding variables.</p> <p>RESULTS: A subset of 120 women underwent radiotherapy; 77 completed treatment prior to the study, and 40 had radiotherapy during the MBSR intervention. Women who actively received radiotherapy (art) while participating in the MBSR intervention (MBSR-art) experienced a significant (P < .05) improvement in 16 psychosocial variables compared with the NEP-art, UC-art, or both at 4 months. These included health-related, BrCA-specific quality of life and psychosocial coping, which were the primary outcomes, and secondary measures, including meaningfulness, helplessness, cognitive avoidance, depression, paranoid ideation, hostility, anxiety, global severity, anxious preoccupation, and emotional control.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: MBSR appears to facilitate psychosocial adjustment in BrCA patients receiving radiotherapy, suggesting applicability for MBSR as adjunctive therapy in oncological practice.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/573
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
dc.source.pages404-13


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record