Patient-reported functional health and well-being outcomes with drug therapy: a systematic review of randomized trials using the SF-36 health survey
UMass Chan AffiliationsDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences
Document TypeJournal Article
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Reproducibility of Results
Health Services Research
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the responsiveness of the SF-36 Health Survey in drug trials and to determine how often clinically efficacious treatments produce meaningful functional health changes across medical conditions. RESEARCH DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled drug trials published from 1995 to 2011 that documented results for primary clinical endpoints and SF-36 outcomes. PubMed and a database of SF-36 publications were searched. We evaluated responsiveness as concordance (both statistically significant or both nonsignificant) between primary clinical and SF-36 outcomes. To determine how often SF-36 physical and mental component summary (PCS, MCS) score changes were of meaningful magnitude, mean net of placebo changes with treatment were compared against the developer's recommended 3-point threshold for a minimal important difference (MID) across groups of medical conditions. RESULTS: Of 805 screened trials, 185 met eligibility criteria. Primary clinical and SF-36 outcomes were concordant in 151 trials (82%). Among clinically efficacious trials, 58% reported net mean SF-36 improvements > /=MID threshold; however, SF-36 changes were often modest (PCS IQR, 1.6-4.1; MCS IQR, 0.8-3.5). Variations in treatment impact were apparent across conditions. Clinically efficacious therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis consistently achieved the largest SF-36 improvements, with 87% exceeding MID, whereas no efficacious therapies for peripheral arterial disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease achieved MID threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 responds to treatment impact, distinguishing drug therapies that, on average, produce meaningful functional health benefits. Overall, just over half of clinically efficacious trials report meaningful functional health improvements, and results vary widely by medical condition.
SourceMed Care. 2014 May;52(5):439-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.000000000000010311. Link to article on publisher's site
Permanent Link to this Itemhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30429
Related ResourcesLink to Article in PubMed
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
A Public Health Framework for the State Mental Health Authority: A Call for Action by Massachusetts Consumers and Family MembersDelman, Jonathan (2006-01-01)During the Spring of 2006, Consumer Quality Initiatives (CQI) conducted 20 focus groups across the state, 12 with adults with mental illness, 3 with parents of youth with serious emotional disorder, 2 with youth with SED, 1 with family members of adult consumers, and 2 with youth in transition. Supported by a contract with Massachusetts Department of Mental Health (DMH), the goal was to assist DMH in framing the criteria for its upcoming reprocurement. Our findings reveal a frustration with an approach to health care delivery that focuses primarily on the provision of psychiatric care (egs, medication, therapy, hospitalization). We reviewed the focus group reports to identify the most significant themes, which clustered within eight broad categories.
Policy Brief: Addressing Social Determinants of Health through Community Health Workers: A Call to ActionLondon, Katharine; Damio, Grace; Ferrazo, Meredith; Perez-Escamalla, Rafael; Wiggins, Noelle (2018-01-30)This technical report was compiled by the Hispanic Health Council in partnership with Southwestern AHEC and a panel of Community Health Worker Policy Research Experts which included our Katharine London from the Center for Health Law and Economics. The report offers a number of policy recommendations for community health workers for communities that might benefit from community-based services. The report offers recommendations on; payment of community health workers; community health worker caseloads; community health worker recruitment; community health worker training; reflective and trauma-informed mentoring and supportive supervision of community health workers; integration of community health workers into care teams; documenting the effect of community heal worker services on social determination of health. The Hispanic Health Council believes a service design that effectively supports community health workers would incorporate the seven areas of policy recommendation included in this report.
Making the Case for Sustainable Funding for Community Health Worker Services: Talking to Payers and ProvidersLondon, Katharine (2018-01-27)In this presentation, Katharine London of the Center for Health Law and Economics makes her case for offering sustainable funding for community health worker services. Research has shown community health workers can have a distinct impact on health systems, helping them improve population health and contain costs, while also promoting health equity and community engagement. This presentation was designed to assist CHWs and other advocates in engaging with policymakers and payers to support CHW sustainability and develop a financial plan for their CHW work. It was presented as part of a CHW Sustainability event held at the Families USA’s annual conference, Health Action 2018: Staying Strong for America’s Families, in Washington, DC. See Katharine London's blog post on payment delivery methods for community health workers here.