Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWellman, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorDiFranza, Joseph R.
dc.contributor.authorO'Loughlin, Jennifer
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:33.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T15:59:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T15:59:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-01
dc.date.submitted2016-02-24
dc.identifier.citationAddict Behav. 2015 Nov;50:217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.033. Epub 2015 Jun 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.033">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0306-4603 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.033
dc.identifier.pmid26162621
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30596
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: The Autonomy over Tobacco Scale (AUTOS), a 12-item self-administered questionnaire, was designed to measure autonomy in three correlated lower-order symptom domains: withdrawal, psychological dependence, and cue-induced craving. The factor structure of the AUTOS remains an open question; confirmatory analyses in adolescents supported the hierarchical structure, while exploratory analyses in adolescents and adults yield single-factor solutions. Here we seek to determine whether the hypothesized hierarchical structure is valid in adult smokers. METHODS: The AUTOS was administered to two independent convenience samples of adult current smokers: a calibration sample recruited in the US for online studies, and a confirmation sample drawn from the prospective Nicotine Dependence in Teens study in Montreal. We tested competing hierarchical and single-factor models using the robust weighted least-squares (WLSMV) estimation method. RESULTS: A single-factor model that allowed correlated error variances between theoretically related items fit well in the calibration sample (n = 434), chi(2)SB(52) = 165.71; chi(2)/df = 3.19; SRMR = 0.03; CFI = 0.96; NNFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.08). Reliability of the single factor was high (omegaB = 0.92) and construct validity was adequate. In the confirmation sample (n = 335), a similar model fit well: chi(2)SB(53) = 126.94; chi(2)/df = 2.44; SRMR = 0.04; CFI = 0.95; NNFI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.08). Reliability of the single factor was again high (omegaB = 0.92) and construct validity was adequate. CONCLUSION: The AUTOS is unidimensional in adult smokers.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=26162621&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.033
dc.subjectAUTOS
dc.subjectAdults
dc.subjectAutonomy over tobacco
dc.subjectCFA
dc.subjectNicotine dependence
dc.subjectSmoking
dc.subjectSubstance Abuse and Addiction
dc.titleConfirmatory factor analysis of the Autonomy over Tobacco Scale (AUTOS) in adults
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleAddictive behaviors
dc.source.volume50
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/faculty_pubs/875
dc.identifier.contextkey8205605
html.description.abstract<p>INTRODUCTION: The Autonomy over Tobacco Scale (AUTOS), a 12-item self-administered questionnaire, was designed to measure autonomy in three correlated lower-order symptom domains: withdrawal, psychological dependence, and cue-induced craving. The factor structure of the AUTOS remains an open question; confirmatory analyses in adolescents supported the hierarchical structure, while exploratory analyses in adolescents and adults yield single-factor solutions. Here we seek to determine whether the hypothesized hierarchical structure is valid in adult smokers.</p> <p>METHODS: The AUTOS was administered to two independent convenience samples of adult current smokers: a calibration sample recruited in the US for online studies, and a confirmation sample drawn from the prospective Nicotine Dependence in Teens study in Montreal. We tested competing hierarchical and single-factor models using the robust weighted least-squares (WLSMV) estimation method.</p> <p>RESULTS: A single-factor model that allowed correlated error variances between theoretically related items fit well in the calibration sample (n = 434), chi(2)SB(52) = 165.71; chi(2)/df = 3.19; SRMR = 0.03; CFI = 0.96; NNFI = 0.95; RMSEA = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.08). Reliability of the single factor was high (omegaB = 0.92) and construct validity was adequate. In the confirmation sample (n = 335), a similar model fit well: chi(2)SB(53) = 126.94; chi(2)/df = 2.44; SRMR = 0.04; CFI = 0.95; NNFI = 0.93; RMSEA = 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.08). Reliability of the single factor was again high (omegaB = 0.92) and construct validity was adequate.</p> <p>CONCLUSION: The AUTOS is unidimensional in adult smokers.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfaculty_pubs/875
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages217-21


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record