Bone Mineral Density as a Predictor of Subsequent Wrist Fractures: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative Study
Authors
Crandall, Carolyn J.Hovey, Kathleen M.
Andrews, Christopher A.
Cauley, Jane A.
Manson, JoAnn E.
Wactawski-Wende, Jean
Wright, Nicole C.
Li, Wenjun
Beavers, Kristen
Curtis, Jeffrey R.
LeBoff, Meryl S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Prevention Research CenterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine
Document Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2015-11-01Keywords
Age FactorsAged
Bone Density
Cohort Studies
Estrogen Replacement Therapy
Female
Femur Neck
Follow-Up Studies
Fractures, Bone
Humans
Incidence
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis
Osteoporotic Fractures
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Spine
*Women
Wrist Injuries
Clinical Epidemiology
Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism
Epidemiology
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Women's Health
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
CONTEXT: Wrist fractures are common among postmenopausal women. Associations of bone mineral density (BMD) and 10-year predicted risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) with wrist fractures are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to examine associations between the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-predicted risk of MOF, BMD, BMD change, and wrist fracture. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years. SETTING: This study included 40 US centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11 392 participants from the Women's Health Initiative BMD Cohort aged 50-79 years at baseline were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME: The goal was to measure incident wrist fracture. RESULTS: A FRAX-predicted MOF risk > /=9.3% identified 17% of the women aged < 65 years who subsequently experienced wrist fracture. Each one standard deviation lower BMD was associated with higher wrist fracture risk, with adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.66 (1.42-1.93) for femoral neck (FN) BMD and 1.45 (1.28-1.64) for lumbar spine BMD. Compared with FN BMD T score > /= -1.0, wrist fracture adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were: 1.51 (1.06-2.16) for a T score between -1.01 and -1.49; 1.93 (1.36-2.72) for T score between -1.50 and -1.99; 2.52 (1.77-3.60) for a T score between -2.00 and -2.49; and 2.65 (1.78-3.95) for a T score < /= -2.5. Decrease in FN BMD between baseline and year 3 was associated with increased risk of subsequent wrist fracture; however, change in lumbar spine BMD was not. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine and femoral neck BMDs were associated with incident wrist fracture, but the FRAX threshold recommended to identify screening candidates did not identify the majority of women who subsequently experienced wrist fracture. Improved understanding of determinants of wrist fractures is warranted.Source
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Nov;100(11):4315-24. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2568. Epub 2015 Sep 14. Link to article on publisher's siteDOI
10.1210/jc.2015-2568Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30605PubMed ID
26367200Related Resources
Link to Article in PubMedae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1210/jc.2015-2568