• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Staff Research and Publications
    • UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of eScholarship@UMassChanCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywordsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsUMass Chan AffiliationsTitlesDocument TypesKeywords

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Help

    AboutSubmission GuidelinesData Deposit PolicySearchingTerms of UseWebsite Migration FAQ

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests' Performance between Delta (B.1.61.7; AY.X) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA1) Variants of SARS-CoV-2: Secondary Analysis from a Serial Home Self-Testing Study [preprint]

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Authors
    Soni, Apurv
    Herbert, Carly
    Filippaios, Andreas
    Broach, John P.
    Colubri, Andres
    Fahey, Nisha
    Woods, Kelsey
    Nanavati, Janvi
    Wright, Colton
    Orwig, Taylor
    Gilliam, Karen
    Lin, Honghuang
    O'Connor, Laurel
    Pretz, Caitlin
    Ayturk, M. Didem
    Orvek, Elizabeth Aaker
    Flahive, Julie M.
    Lazar, Peter
    Shi, Qiming
    Gibson, Laura L.
    Stamegna, Pamela
    Hafer, Nathaniel S.
    Luzuriaga, Katherine
    Barton, Bruce A.
    McManus, David D.
    RADx Clinical Studies Core team and Test Us At Home Investigators
    Show allShow less
    UMass Chan Affiliations
    Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine
    Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Program in Molecular Medicine
    UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science
    Department of Pediatrics
    Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology
    Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems
    Department of Emergency Medicine
    Division of Clinical Informatics, Department of Medicine
    Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences
    Program in Digital Medicine, Department of Medicine
    Document Type
    Preprint
    Publication Date
    2022-03-02
    Keywords
    Infectious Diseases
    rapid antigen tests
    SARS-CoV-2
    COVID-19
    UMCCTS funding
    Epidemiology
    Immunology and Infectious Disease
    Infectious Disease
    Microbiology
    Virus Diseases
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Link to Full Text
    https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.27.22271090
    Abstract
    Background: There is a need to understand the performance of rapid antigen tests (Ag-RDT) for detection of the Delta (B.1.61.7; AY.X) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA1) SARS-CoV-2 variants. Methods: Participants without any symptoms were enrolled from October 18, 2021 to January 24, 2022 and performed Ag-RDT and RT-PCR tests every 48 hours for 15 days. This study represents a non-pre-specified analysis in which we sought to determine if sensitivity of Ag-RDT differed in participants with Delta compared to Omicron variant. Participants who were positive on RT-PCR on the first day of the testing period were excluded. Delta and Omicron variants were defined based on sequencing and date of first RT-PCR positive result (RT-PCR+). Comparison of Ag-RDT performance between the variants was based on sensitivity, defined as proportion of participants with Ag-RDT+ results in relation to their first RT-PCR+ result, for different duration of testing with rapid Ag-RDT. Subsample analysis was performed based on the result of participants' second RT-PCR test within 48 hours of the first RT-PCR+ test. Results: From the 7,349 participants enrolled in the parent study, 5,506 met the eligibility criteria for this analysis. A total of 153 participants were RT-PCR+ (61 Delta, 92 Omicron); among this group, 36 (23.5%) tested Ag-RDT+ on the same day, and 84 (54.9%) tested Ag-RDT+ within 48 hours as first RT-PCR+. The differences in sensitivity between variants were not statistically significant (same-day: Delta 16.4% [95% CI: 8.2-28.1] vs Omicron 28.2% [95% CI: 19.4-38.6]; and 48-hours: Delta 45.9% [33.1-59.2] vs. Omicron 60.9% [50.1-70.9]). This trend continued among the 86 participants who had consecutive RT-PCR+ result (48-hour sensitivity: Delta 79.3% [60.3-92.1] vs. Omicron: 89.5% [78.5-96.0]). Conversely, the 38 participants who had an isolated RT-PCR+ remained consistently negative on Ag-RDT, regardless of the variant. Conclusions: The performance of Ag-RDT is not inferior among individuals infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant as compared to the Delta variant. The improvement in sensitivity of Ag-RDT noted with serial testing is consistent between Delta and Omicron variant. Performance of Ag-RDT varies based on duration of RT-PCR+ results and more studies are needed to understand the clinical and public health significance of individuals who are RT-PCR+ for less than 48 hours.
    Source

    Soni A, Herbert C, Filippaios A, Broach J, Colubri A, Fahey N, Woods K, Nanavati J, Wright C, Orwig T, Gilliam K, Kheterpal V, Suvarna T, Nowak C, Schrader S, Lin H, O'Connor L, Pretz C, Ayturk D, Orvek E, Flahive J, Lazar P, Shi Q, Achenbach C, Murphy R, Robinson M, Gibson L, Stamegna P, Hafer N, Luzuriaga K, Barton B, Heetderks W, Manabe YC, McManus D. Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests' Performance between Delta (B.1.61.7; AY.X) and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA1) Variants of SARS-CoV-2: Secondary Analysis from a Serial Home Self-Testing Study. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2022 Mar 2:2022.02.27.22271090. doi: 10.1101/2022.02.27.22271090. PMID: 35262091; PMCID: PMC8902878. Link to preprint on medRxiv.

    DOI
    10.1101/2022.02.27.22271090
    Permanent Link to this Item
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30738
    PubMed ID
    35262091
    Notes

    This article is a preprint. Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been certified by peer review.

    Full author list omitted for brevity. For the full list of authors, see article.

    Related Resources

    View preprint in PubMed

    Rights
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1101/2022.02.27.22271090
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    COVID-19 Publications by UMass Chan Authors
    UMass Chan Faculty and Researcher Publications
    Population and Quantitative Health Sciences Publications
    Program in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology Publications
    UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science Supported Publications
    Emergency Medicine Publications

    entitlement

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Chan Medical School | 55 Lake Avenue North | Worcester, MA 01655 USA
    Quick Guide | escholarship@umassmed.edu
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.