Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTveito, Torill Helene
dc.contributor.authorShaw, William S.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yueng-Hsiang
dc.contributor.authorNicholas, Michael
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Gregory
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:00:29Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2010-09-01
dc.date.submitted2012-05-21
dc.identifier.citationDisabil Rehabil. 2010;32(24):2035-45. Epub 2010 Sep 23. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638281003797398">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0963-8288 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.3109/09638281003797398
dc.identifier.pmid20860528
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30894
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Most working adults with low back pain (LBP) continue to work despite pain, but few studies have assessed self-management strategies in this at-work population. The purpose of this study was to identify workplace challenges and self-management strategies reported by workers remaining at work despite recurrent or persistent LBP, to be used as a framework for the development of a workplace group intervention to prevent back disability. METHOD: Workers with LBP (n = 38) participated in five focus groups, and audio recordings of sessions were analysed to assemble lists of common challenges and coping strategies. A separate analysis provided a general categorisation of major themes. RESULTS: Workplace pain challenges fell within four domains: activity interference, negative self-perceptions, interpersonal challenges and inflexibility of work. Self-management strategies consisted of modifying work activities and routines, reducing pain symptoms, using cognitive strategies and communicating pain effectively. Theme extraction identified six predominant themes: knowing your work setting, talking about pain, being prepared for a bad day, thoughts and emotions, keeping moving and finding leeway. CONCLUSIONS: To retain workers with LBP, this qualitative investigation suggests future intervention efforts should focus on worker communication and cognitions related to pain, pacing of work and employer efforts to provide leeway for altered job routines.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=20860528&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638281003797398
dc.subject*Adaptation, Psychological
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectChronic Disease
dc.subject*Employment
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLow Back Pain
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Self Care
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectWorkplace
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectPreventive Medicine
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleManaging pain in the workplace: a focus group study of challenges, strategies and what matters most to workers with low back pain
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleDisability and rehabilitation
dc.source.volume32
dc.source.issue24
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/fmch_articles/220
dc.identifier.contextkey2879132
html.description.abstract<p>PURPOSE: Most working adults with low back pain (LBP) continue to work despite pain, but few studies have assessed self-management strategies in this at-work population. The purpose of this study was to identify workplace challenges and self-management strategies reported by workers remaining at work despite recurrent or persistent LBP, to be used as a framework for the development of a workplace group intervention to prevent back disability.</p> <p>METHOD: Workers with LBP (n = 38) participated in five focus groups, and audio recordings of sessions were analysed to assemble lists of common challenges and coping strategies. A separate analysis provided a general categorisation of major themes.</p> <p>RESULTS: Workplace pain challenges fell within four domains: activity interference, negative self-perceptions, interpersonal challenges and inflexibility of work. Self-management strategies consisted of modifying work activities and routines, reducing pain symptoms, using cognitive strategies and communicating pain effectively. Theme extraction identified six predominant themes: knowing your work setting, talking about pain, being prepared for a bad day, thoughts and emotions, keeping moving and finding leeway.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: To retain workers with LBP, this qualitative investigation suggests future intervention efforts should focus on worker communication and cognitions related to pain, pacing of work and employer efforts to provide leeway for altered job routines.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfmch_articles/220
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages2035-45


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record