Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMajor, Jacqueline M.
dc.contributor.authorOliver, M. Norman
dc.contributor.authorDoubeni, Chyke A.
dc.contributor.authorHollenbeck, Albert R.
dc.contributor.authorGraubard, Barry I.
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Rashmi
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:00:33Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-01
dc.date.submitted2012-10-09
dc.identifier.citation<p>Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Jul;23(7):1185-91. Epub 2012 May 22. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9988-8" target="_blank">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0957-5243 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10552-012-9988-8
dc.identifier.pmid22674292
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30906
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to separately examine the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and availability of healthcare resources on prostate cancer risk among African American and Caucasian men. METHODS: In the large, prospective NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we analyzed baseline (1995-1996) data from adult men, aged 50-71 years. Incident prostate cancer cases (n = 22,523; 1,089 among African Americans) were identified through December 2006. Lifestyle and health risk information was ascertained by questionnaires administered at baseline. Area-level socioeconomic indicators were ascertained by linkage to the US Census and the Area Resource File. Multilevel Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A differential effect among African Americans and Caucasians was observed for neighborhood deprivation (p-interaction = 0.04), percent uninsured (p-interaction = 0.02), and urologist density (p-interaction = 0.01). Compared to men living in counties with the highest density of urologists, those with fewer had a substantially increased risk of developing advanced prostate cancer (HR = 2.68, 95 % CI = 1.31, 5.47) among African American. CONCLUSIONS: Certain socioeconomic indicators were associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer among African American men compared to Caucasians. Minimizing differences in healthcare availability may be a potentially important pathway to minimizing disparities in prostate cancer risk.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=22674292&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-9988-8
dc.subjectProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectMale Urogenital Diseases
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.subjectPreventive Medicine
dc.subjectPrimary Care
dc.titleSocioeconomic status, healthcare density, and risk of prostate cancer among African American and Caucasian men in a large prospective study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleCancer causes and control : CCC
dc.source.volume23
dc.source.issue7
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/fmch_articles/231
dc.identifier.contextkey3379047
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to separately examine the impact of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and availability of healthcare resources on prostate cancer risk among African American and Caucasian men.</p> <p>METHODS: In the large, prospective NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, we analyzed baseline (1995-1996) data from adult men, aged 50-71 years. Incident prostate cancer cases (n = 22,523; 1,089 among African Americans) were identified through December 2006. Lifestyle and health risk information was ascertained by questionnaires administered at baseline. Area-level socioeconomic indicators were ascertained by linkage to the US Census and the Area Resource File. Multilevel Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).</p> <p>RESULTS: A differential effect among African Americans and Caucasians was observed for neighborhood deprivation (p-interaction = 0.04), percent uninsured (p-interaction = 0.02), and urologist density (p-interaction = 0.01). Compared to men living in counties with the highest density of urologists, those with fewer had a substantially increased risk of developing advanced prostate cancer (HR = 2.68, 95 % CI = 1.31, 5.47) among African American.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: Certain socioeconomic indicators were associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer among African American men compared to Caucasians. Minimizing differences in healthcare availability may be a potentially important pathway to minimizing disparities in prostate cancer risk.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfmch_articles/231
dc.contributor.departmentMeyers Primary Care Institute
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages1185-91


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record