Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWellman, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSugarman, David B.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:35.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:00:41Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:00:41Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01
dc.date.submitted2015-06-08
dc.identifier.citationWellman, R. J., & Sugarman, D. B. (2006). The impact of personal expectations on counterfactual thinking about life and death medical decisions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 81-89. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2801
dc.identifier.doi10.1207/s15324834basp2801
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30938
dc.description.abstractWe examined the impact of social perceivers' self-referent norms (i.e., their own expectations of what should occur) on counterfactual thinking in health care decision making regarding treatment termination. We presented participants with a "patient's dilemma" in which continuing or stopping medical treatment raised the risk of death for the patient and/or her developing fetus. Participants (N = 217) recommended a course of action to the patient, predicted consensus with that recommendation, and assessed the likely risks of both actions. We exposed them to an outcome in which the patient either continued or stopped treatment with either positive or negative consequences. Disagreement with the patient's treatment decision was associated with attributions of greater predictability, regret, and responsibility when the outcome was negative, suggesting the prompting of counterfactual processes.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_7
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectPreventive Medicine
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Psychology
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.titleThe Impact of Personal Expectations on Counterfactual Thinking About Life and Death Medical Decisions
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleBasic and Applied Social Psychology
dc.source.volume28
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/fmch_articles/270
dc.identifier.contextkey7188825
html.description.abstract<p>We examined the impact of social perceivers' self-referent norms (i.e., their own expectations of what should occur) on counterfactual thinking in health care decision making regarding treatment termination. We presented participants with a "patient's dilemma" in which continuing or stopping medical treatment raised the risk of death for the patient and/or her developing fetus. Participants (N = 217) recommended a course of action to the patient, predicted consensus with that recommendation, and assessed the likely risks of both actions. We exposed them to an outcome in which the patient either continued or stopped treatment with either positive or negative consequences. Disagreement with the patient's treatment decision was associated with attributions of greater predictability, regret, and responsibility when the outcome was negative, suggesting the prompting of counterfactual processes.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfmch_articles/270
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages81-89


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record