Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarron, Kenneth I.
dc.contributor.authorSavageau, Judith A.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Stephen B.
dc.contributor.authorLabin, Lisa C.
dc.contributor.authorMorse, Abraham N.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:36.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:00:50Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:00:50Z
dc.date.issued2006-11-01
dc.date.submitted2008-06-13
dc.identifier.citationInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):570-5. Epub 2006 Apr 1. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0064-8">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00192-005-0064-8
dc.identifier.pmid16583182
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/30976
dc.description<p>Medical student Kenneth Barron participated in this study as part of the Senior Scholars research program.</p>
dc.description.abstractWe set out to identify predictors of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. The charts of 126 patients who underwent an outpatient mid-urethral sling procedure were identified. Using discharge without a urinary catheter as the dependent variable, logistic regression analysis modeled the relationship of independent variables including demographic, preoperative urodynamic, and perioperative variables. Sixty-one percent of the patients passed their immediate postoperative voiding trial. Logistic regression analysis revealed that parity > or = 3, Valsalva leak point pressure > 60 cm H(2)O, and high preoperative anxiety remained independently associated with successful voiding. Identifying preoperative variables that are associated with successful voiding after mid-urethral sling may be useful in helping to accurately shape patient expectations and identify those most likely to benefit from preoperative teaching of self-catheterization.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16583182&dopt=Abstract ">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-005-0064-8
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAmbulatory Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subject*Prostheses and Implants
dc.subject*Recovery of Function
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinence, Stress
dc.subjectUrinary Retention
dc.subject*Urination
dc.subjectUrodynamics
dc.subjectUrologic Surgical Procedures, Male
dc.subjectObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subjectUrology
dc.titlePrediction of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
dc.source.volume17
dc.source.issue6
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/fmch_articles/32
dc.identifier.contextkey525881
html.description.abstract<p>We set out to identify predictors of successful voiding immediately after outpatient mid-urethral sling. The charts of 126 patients who underwent an outpatient mid-urethral sling procedure were identified. Using discharge without a urinary catheter as the dependent variable, logistic regression analysis modeled the relationship of independent variables including demographic, preoperative urodynamic, and perioperative variables. Sixty-one percent of the patients passed their immediate postoperative voiding trial. Logistic regression analysis revealed that parity > or = 3, Valsalva leak point pressure > 60 cm H(2)O, and high preoperative anxiety remained independently associated with successful voiding. Identifying preoperative variables that are associated with successful voiding after mid-urethral sling may be useful in helping to accurately shape patient expectations and identify those most likely to benefit from preoperative teaching of self-catheterization.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathfmch_articles/32
dc.contributor.departmentSenior Scholars Program
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages570-5


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record