We are upgrading the repository! The content freeze has been extended to December 11, 2024, when we expect the new repository to become available. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed until after the new website goes live. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDouglas M. Ziedonis, MD, MPH
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Melissa L
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:45.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:07:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:07:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-10
dc.date.submitted2016-07-11
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/M2S882
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/32186
dc.description.abstractDeaf individuals experience significant obstacles to participating in behavioral health research when careful consideration is not given to accessibility in the design of study methodology. To inform such considerations, we conducted a secondary analysis of a mixed-methods study that explored 16 Deaf trauma survivors’ help-seeking experiences. Our objective was to identify key findings and qualitative themes from consumers' own words that can be applied to the design of behavioral clinical trials methodology. In many ways, the themes that emerged are what we would expect of any research participant, Deaf or hearing – a need for communication access, empathy, respect, strict confidentiality procedures, trust, and transparency of the research process. However, additional considerations must be made to better recruit, retain, and engage Deaf trauma survivors. We summarize our findings in a “Checklist for Designing Deaf Behavioral Clinical Trials” to operationalize the steps researchers should take to apply Deaf-friendly approaches in their empirical work.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Massachusetts Medical Schoolen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved.
dc.subjectTheses, UMMS
dc.subjectPersons With Hearing Impairments
dc.subjectBehavioral Research
dc.subjectPsychological Trauma
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectPersons With Hearing Impairments
dc.subjectBehavioral Research
dc.subjectPsychological Trauma
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectDeaf Trauma Survivors
dc.subjectBehavior and Behavior Mechanisms
dc.subjectCommunication Sciences and Disorders
dc.subjectHealth Psychology
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectInvestigative Techniques
dc.titleBarriers and Facilitators to Deaf Trauma Survivors’ Help-Seeking Behavior: Lessons for Behavioral Clinical Trials Research: A Master’s Thesis
dc.typeMaster's Thesis
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1818&context=gsbs_diss&unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/816
dc.legacy.embargo2016-05-11T00:00:00-07:00
dc.identifier.contextkey8822370
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-26T03:14:05Z
html.description.abstract<p>Deaf individuals experience significant obstacles to participating in behavioral health research when careful consideration is not given to accessibility in the design of study methodology. To inform such considerations, we conducted a secondary analysis of a mixed-methods study that explored 16 Deaf trauma survivors’ help-seeking experiences. Our objective was to identify key findings and qualitative themes from consumers' own words that can be applied to the design of behavioral clinical trials methodology. In many ways, the themes that emerged are what we would expect of any research participant, Deaf or hearing – a need for communication access, empathy, respect, strict confidentiality procedures, trust, and transparency of the research process. However, additional considerations must be made to better recruit, retain, and engage Deaf trauma survivors. We summarize our findings in a “Checklist for Designing Deaf Behavioral Clinical Trials” to operationalize the steps researchers should take to apply Deaf-friendly approaches in their empirical work.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsbs_diss/816
dc.contributor.departmentPsychiatry
dc.description.thesisprogramMaster of Science in Clinical Investigation


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Anderson_Melissa_final.pdf
Size:
404.3Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record