Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAdel Bozorgzadeh, MD, FACS
dc.contributor.advisorFred A. Anderson, PhD
dc.contributor.authorDolgin, Natasha H.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:45.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:07:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:07:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-04
dc.date.submitted2016-07-11
dc.identifier.doi10.13028/M2759F
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/32187
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the transplant community has explored and adopted tools for quantifying clinical insight into illness severity and frailty. This dissertation work explores the interplay between objective and subjective assessments of physical health status and the implications for liver transplant candidate and recipient outcomes. The first aim characterizes national epidemiologic trends and the impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid quality improvement policies on likelihood of waitlist removal based on the patient being too frail to benefit from liver transplant (“too sick to transplant”). This aim includes more than a decade (2002–2012) of comprehensive national transplant waitlist data (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)). The second aim will assess and define objective parameters of liver transplant patient frailty by measuring decline in lean core muscle mass (“sarcopenia”) using abdominal CT scans collected retrospectively at a single U.S. transplant center between 2006 and 2015. The relationship between these objective sarcopenia measures and subjective functional status assessed using the Karnofsky Functional Performance (KPS) scale are described and quantified. The third aim quantifies the extent to which poor functional status (KPS) pre-transplant is associated with worse post-transplant survival and includes national data on liver transplantations conducted between 2005 and 2014 (SRTR). The results of this dissertation will help providers in the assessment of frailty and subsequent risk of adverse outcomes and has implications for strategic clinical management in anticipation of surgery. This research will also to serve to inform national policy on the design of transplant center performance measures.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved.
dc.subjectDissertations, UMMS
dc.subjectHealth Status
dc.subjectLiver Transplantation
dc.subjectQuality Improvement
dc.subjectTransplant Recipients
dc.subjectSarcopenia
dc.subjectSurvival Analysis
dc.subjectPatient Outcome Assessment
dc.subjectWaiting Lists
dc.subjectHealth Status
dc.subjectLiver Transplantation
dc.subjectQuality Improvement
dc.subjectTransplant Recipients
dc.subjectSarcopenia
dc.subjectSurvival Analysis
dc.subjectPatient Outcome Assessment
dc.subjectWaiting Lists
dc.subjectClinical Epidemiology
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleFrailty and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation: A Dissertation
dc.typeDoctoral Dissertation
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1819&context=gsbs_diss&unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_diss/817
dc.legacy.embargo2016-04-04T00:00:00-07:00
dc.identifier.contextkey8822688
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-26T03:18:23Z
html.description.abstract<p>In recent years, the transplant community has explored and adopted tools for quantifying clinical insight into illness severity and frailty. This dissertation work explores the interplay between objective and subjective assessments of physical health status and the implications for liver transplant candidate and recipient outcomes. The first aim characterizes national epidemiologic trends and the impact of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid quality improvement policies on likelihood of waitlist removal based on the patient being too frail to benefit from liver transplant (“too sick to transplant”). This aim includes more than a decade (2002–2012) of comprehensive national transplant waitlist data (Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR)). The second aim will assess and define objective parameters of liver transplant patient frailty by measuring decline in lean core muscle mass (“sarcopenia”) using abdominal CT scans collected retrospectively at a single U.S. transplant center between 2006 and 2015. The relationship between these objective sarcopenia measures and subjective functional status assessed using the Karnofsky Functional Performance (KPS) scale are described and quantified. The third aim quantifies the extent to which poor functional status (KPS) pre-transplant is associated with worse post-transplant survival and includes national data on liver transplantations conducted between 2005 and 2014 (SRTR). The results of this dissertation will help providers in the assessment of frailty and subsequent risk of adverse outcomes and has implications for strategic clinical management in anticipation of surgery. This research will also to serve to inform national policy on the design of transplant center performance measures.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsbs_diss/817
dc.contributor.departmentSurgery
dc.description.thesisprogramClinical and Population Health Research


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Dolgin_Natasha_Final.pdf
Size:
1.053Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record