mRNA Decay Pathways Use Translation Fidelity and Competing Decapping Complexes for Substrate Selection
Authors
Celik, AlperFaculty Advisor
Allan Jacobson, Ph.D.Academic Program
Interdisciplinary Graduate ProgramUMass Chan Affiliations
Microbiology and Physiological SystemsDocument Type
Doctoral DissertationPublication Date
2017-05-15Keywords
NMDDecapping
dcp2
dcp1
xrn1
upf
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Genomics
Laboratory and Basic Science Research
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
mRNA decay is an important step in gene regulation, environmental responsiveness, and mRNA quality control. One such quality control pathway, Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay (NMD), targets transcripts whose translation terminates prematurely. However, the scope and the defining features of NMD-targeted transcripts remain elusive. To address these issues, we re-evaluated the genome-wide expression of annotated transcripts in yeast cells harboring deletions of the UPF1, UPF2, or UPF3 genes. The vast majority of NMD-regulated transcripts are normal-looking protein-coding mRNAs. Our bioinformatics analyses reveal that this set of NMD-regulated transcripts generally have lower translational efficiency, lower average codon optimality scores, and higher ratios of out-of-frame translation. General mRNA decay is predominantly mediated by decapping by the Dcp1-Dcp2 complex and 5' to 3' decay by Xrn1, but the exact mechanism of decapping regulation has remained largely unknown. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have revealed the importance of the C-terminal extension of Dcp2 and the identities of many decapping regulators that interact with the decapping complex. To better understand how decapping regulation is achieved by the C-terminal extension of Dcp2 we generated RNA-Seq libraries from a Dcp2 allele that lacks this portion of Dcp2 along with libraries from strains that contain single deletions of several decapping activators. Our transcriptome-wide results indicate that the C-terminal extension of Dcp2 is crucial for efficient regulation of decapping, and different decapping activators are responsible for targeting different sets of mRNAs. Considering the limited pool of Dcp1-Dcp2 in the cell decapping activators might be in competition for decapping complex binding. Collectively, our results yield valuable insights into the mechanism of substrate selection for mRNA quality control and decay in yeast.DOI
10.13028/M2H38VPermanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/32284Rights
Licensed under a Creative Commons licenseDistribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/M2H38V
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Licensed under a Creative Commons license