Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMustjoki, Satu
dc.contributor.authorBorze, Ioana
dc.contributor.authorLasho, Terra L.
dc.contributor.authorAlitalo, Riitta
dc.contributor.authorPardanani, Animesh Dev
dc.contributor.authorKnuutila, Sakari
dc.contributor.authorJuvonen, Eeva
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:52.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:10:44Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:10:44Z
dc.date.issued2008-09-02
dc.date.submitted2009-02-25
dc.identifier.citationLeuk Res. 2009 Jan;33(1):54-9. Epub 2008 Aug 28. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2008.07.008">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0145-2126 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.leukres.2008.07.008
dc.identifier.pmid18760472
dc.identifier.pmid18760472
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/33004
dc.description.abstractThe in vitro cultures of erythroid (BFU-E) and megakaryocytic (CFU-Meg) progenitors have been useful diagnostic tools in myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). However, after the discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation, their diagnostic role has been uncertain. In this single-centre retrospective study we analyzed JAK2V617F mutation in 58 ET and 42 PV patients diagnosed according to WHO criteria and compared the results with those of colony forming assays with special emphasis on CFU-Meg growth. 91% of PV and 57% of ET patients had JAK2V617F mutation and they all showed spontaneous BFU-E growth. However, endogenous BFU-E formation was also seen in nine JAK2V617F mutation negative patients displaying also a normal JAK2 exon 12 allele. Endogeneous CFU-Meg colony formation was found in 59% of PV and 53% of the ET patients. A subgroup of ET patients (n=7) displayed sole spontaneous CFU-Meg growth without spontaneous BFU-E growth. They all were JAK2 mutation negative, but one of them had MPL mutation. In conclusion, in vitro cultures of haematopoietic progenitors are sensitive diagnostic tools in the present group of 100 MPD patients revealing also JAK2 mutation negative ET and PV patients displaying sole spontaneous CFU-Meg or BFU-E growth.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=18760472&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2008.07.008
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleJAK2V617F mutation and spontaneous megakaryocytic or erythroid colony formation in patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) or polycythaemia vera (PV)
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleLeukemia research
dc.source.volume33
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_sp/1552
dc.identifier.contextkey740091
html.description.abstract<p>The in vitro cultures of erythroid (BFU-E) and megakaryocytic (CFU-Meg) progenitors have been useful diagnostic tools in myeloproliferative disorders (MPD). However, after the discovery of the JAK2V617F mutation, their diagnostic role has been uncertain. In this single-centre retrospective study we analyzed JAK2V617F mutation in 58 ET and 42 PV patients diagnosed according to WHO criteria and compared the results with those of colony forming assays with special emphasis on CFU-Meg growth. 91% of PV and 57% of ET patients had JAK2V617F mutation and they all showed spontaneous BFU-E growth. However, endogenous BFU-E formation was also seen in nine JAK2V617F mutation negative patients displaying also a normal JAK2 exon 12 allele. Endogeneous CFU-Meg colony formation was found in 59% of PV and 53% of the ET patients. A subgroup of ET patients (n=7) displayed sole spontaneous CFU-Meg growth without spontaneous BFU-E growth. They all were JAK2 mutation negative, but one of them had MPL mutation. In conclusion, in vitro cultures of haematopoietic progenitors are sensitive diagnostic tools in the present group of 100 MPD patients revealing also JAK2 mutation negative ET and PV patients displaying sole spontaneous CFU-Meg or BFU-E growth.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsbs_sp/1552
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Molecular Medicine
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Clinical Chemistry
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences
dc.source.pages54-9


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Publisher version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record