Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrouf, Jaime L.
dc.contributor.authorThrom, Angela M.
dc.contributor.authorBalestrini, Jenna L.
dc.contributor.authorBush, Katie A.
dc.contributor.authorBilliar, Kristen L.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:08:58.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:14:01Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2007-03-10
dc.date.submitted2008-09-17
dc.identifier.citationTissue Eng. 2007 Apr;13(4):799-807. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0206">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1076-3279 (Print)
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/ten.2006.0206
dc.identifier.pmid17346099
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/33762
dc.description.abstractTransforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is commonly used to promote matrix production for engineered tissues in vitro, yet it also enhances fibroblast contractility. For applications where contraction is undesirable, we hypothesized that epidermal growth factor (EGF) would yield equivalent mechanical properties without enhancing contractility. In this study, the response of human dermal fibroblasts to EGF (5 ng/mL) and TGF-beta1 (5 ng/mL) was determined within hemispheric fibrin-based gels by assessing matrix compaction and strength, cell number, collagen production, and contractility. After 3 weeks, both cytokines enhanced compaction relative to controls, and EGF roughly doubled matrix strength over controls and TGF-beta1-treated samples. TGF-beta1 induced alpha-smooth muscle actin (alphaSMA) expression whereas EGF did not. TGF-beta1 also increased retraction following substrate release while EGF reduced retraction. Treatment with cytochalasin D revealed that, regardless of growth factor, approximately 10% of the total retraction was due to residual matrix stress accumulated during cell-mediated remodeling. EGF increased the cell number by 17%, whereas TGF-beta1 decreased the cell number by 63% relative to controls. EGF and TGF-beta1 stimulated greater collagen content than controls by 49% and 33%, respectively. These data suggest that EGF may be an attractive alternative to TGF-beta1 for engineering fibrin-based connective tissue substitutes with adequate strength and minimal tissue contractility.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=17346099&dopt=Abstract">Link to article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0206
dc.subjectCell Culture Techniques; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Compressive Strength; Connective Tissue; Drug Combinations; Elasticity; Epidermal Growth Factor; Fibrin; Foreskin; Humans; Male; Tissue Engineering; Transforming Growth Factor beta1
dc.subjectLife Sciences
dc.subjectMedicine and Health Sciences
dc.titleDifferential effects of EGF and TGF-beta1 on fibroblast activity in fibrin-based tissue equivalents
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleTissue engineering
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsbs_sp/422
dc.identifier.contextkey632032
html.description.abstract<p>Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is commonly used to promote matrix production for engineered tissues in vitro, yet it also enhances fibroblast contractility. For applications where contraction is undesirable, we hypothesized that epidermal growth factor (EGF) would yield equivalent mechanical properties without enhancing contractility. In this study, the response of human dermal fibroblasts to EGF (5 ng/mL) and TGF-beta1 (5 ng/mL) was determined within hemispheric fibrin-based gels by assessing matrix compaction and strength, cell number, collagen production, and contractility. After 3 weeks, both cytokines enhanced compaction relative to controls, and EGF roughly doubled matrix strength over controls and TGF-beta1-treated samples. TGF-beta1 induced alpha-smooth muscle actin (alphaSMA) expression whereas EGF did not. TGF-beta1 also increased retraction following substrate release while EGF reduced retraction. Treatment with cytochalasin D revealed that, regardless of growth factor, approximately 10% of the total retraction was due to residual matrix stress accumulated during cell-mediated remodeling. EGF increased the cell number by 17%, whereas TGF-beta1 decreased the cell number by 63% relative to controls. EGF and TGF-beta1 stimulated greater collagen content than controls by 49% and 33%, respectively. These data suggest that EGF may be an attractive alternative to TGF-beta1 for engineering fibrin-based connective tissue substitutes with adequate strength and minimal tissue contractility.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsbs_sp/422
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences
dc.source.pages799-807


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record