We are upgrading the repository! The content freeze has been extended to December 11, 2024, when we expect the new repository to become available. New submissions or changes to existing items will not be allowed until after the new website goes live. All content already published will remain publicly available for searching and downloading. Updates will be posted in the Website Upgrade 2024 FAQ in the sidebar Help menu. Reach out to escholarship@umassmed.edu with any questions.
Political Efficacy and Political Participation of Nurse Practitioners: A Dissertation
Authors
O'Rourke, Nancy C.Faculty Advisor
Nancy MorrisUMass Chan Affiliations
Tan Chingfen Graduate School of NursingDocument Type
Doctoral DissertationPublication Date
2016-09-22Keywords
health policynurse practitioners
political efficacy
political participation
Politics
Health Policy
Nursing
Political Science
Public Policy
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
In many states, outdated rules and regulations restrict nurse practitioners (NPs) from practicing to their full potential, often limiting patients’ access to primary care. Modernizing NP state scope of practice laws and allowing patients greater access to NPs services is a priority. Unlike other professions, nurse practitioners have been unable to consistently influence legislative changes to health policy. This study examined the political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners in the United States today (N=632). A descriptive cross sectional design, in conjunction with a political efficacy framework, evaluated nurse practitioners’ participation in political activities and their internal and external political efficacy. Increased internal political efficacy was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with NPs who were older, had specific health policy education, and have been mentored in health policy. Our findings show that NPs vote at consistently higher rates (94%) than the general population and almost 50% report contacting legislators via mail/email/phone. As a group however, NPs report limited participation in other political activities, especially grassroots efforts. These findings hold significant implications for the profession as we strive to make policy changes across the country. It is important that educators assess our current methods of educating NPs about politics and health policy. Professional organizations and policy makers must reexamine outreach and strategies to inspire greater grassroots engagement of NPs.DOI
10.13028/5gav-sm45Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34394Notes
Material from this dissertation has been published in: O'Rourke NC, Crawford SL, Morris NS, Pulcini J. Political Efficacy and Participation of Nurse Practitioners. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2017 Jan 1:1527154417728514. doi: 10.1177/1527154417728514. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 29292658.
Related Resources
Rights
Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved.Distribution License
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.13028/5gav-sm45
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Political Efficacy and Participation of Nurse PractitionersO'Rourke, Nancy C.; Crawford, Sybil L.; Morris, Nancy S.; Pulcini, Joyce (2017-01-01)Twenty-eight states have laws and regulations limiting the ability of nurse practitioners (NPs) to practice to the full extent of their education and training, thereby preventing patients from fully accessing NP services. Revisions to state laws and regulations require NPs to engage in the political process. Understanding the political engagement of NPs may facilitate the efforts of nurse leaders and nursing organizations to promote change in state rules and regulations. The purpose of this study was to describe the political efficacy and political participation of U.S. NPs and gain insight into factors associated with political interest and engagement. In the fall of 2015, we mailed a survey to 2,020 NPs randomly chosen from the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners' database and 632 responded (31% response rate). Participants completed the Trust in Government (external political efficacy) and the Political Efficacy (internal political efficacy) scales, and a demographic form. Overall, NPs have low political efficacy. Older age ( p < /=.001), health policy mentoring ( p < /=.001), and specific education on health policy ( p < /=.001) were all positively associated with internal political efficacy and political participation. External political efficacy was not significantly associated with any of the study variables. Political activities of NPs are largely limited to voting and contacting legislators. Identifying factors that engage NPs in grassroots political activities and the broader political arena is warranted, particularly with current initiatives to make changes to state laws and regulations that limit their practice.
-
Elections 2012: Suppressing Fraud or Suppressing the Vote?Ash, Arlene S.; Lamperti, John W. (2013-01-01)Recent years have seen a wave of laws making it more difficult to vote in the United States. Their ostensible purpose is to prevent voting by persons not legally qualified, and thus to improve public confidence in electoral integrity. Are such laws in fact needed to address serious fraud problems? On the other hand, how many and what kinds of legitimate voters will be, or have been, disenfranchised by them? Is voter confidence positively, or negatively, affected by voter ID laws? This article surveys what is known about these issues and offers suggestions for how statisticians can contribute.
-
Mental health and the run for the White HouseSoreff, Stephen M.; Bazemore, Patricia H. (2008-11-01)