Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDunn, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorDrew, Christa
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorWood, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMora, Eriberto
dc.contributor.authorDiener, Sam
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Donna J.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:04.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:17:00Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:17:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.date.submitted2020-02-13
dc.identifier.citation<p>Dunn M, Drew C, O'Brien J, Wood M, Mora E, Diener S, Perry DJ. A Community-Academic Partnership for School-Based Nonviolence Education: The Healthy Power Program. <em>J Sch Health</em>. 2020 Jan;90(1):65-69. doi: 10.1111/josh.12850. Epub 2019 Nov 24. PMID: 31762056. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12850">Link to article on publisher's site</a></p>
dc.identifier.issn0022-4391 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/josh.12850
dc.identifier.pmid31762056
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34457
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Youth violence is a significant problem affecting community health. Community-academic partnerships can advance youth nonviolence education by synergizing the strengths of collaborators while working toward a common goal. We describe a collaboration between an urban public middle school, community nonprofit, and university-based graduate school of nursing in implementing and evaluating the Healthy Power program, a school-based youth nonviolence program for middle-school boys. METHODS: A participatory program evaluation approach was used to plan and implement evaluation of the Healthy Power program with a cohort of 8 students. Collaborative planning allowed for the selection of measures that reflected program objectives and were of value to community partners while also scientifically sound. A mixed-methods approach included a focus group and a pretest-posttest with quantitative items and open-ended questions. RESULTS: While the quantitative pre-posttest did not show any significant change, the open-ended questions and focus group suggested that students had advanced their understanding and application of conflict resolution skills. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the usefulness of community-academic partnerships for peace/conflict resolution education and program evaluation. Such programs may benefit from mixed methods of evaluation.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<p><a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=31762056&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a></p>
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12850
dc.subjectanti-sexist education
dc.subjectcommunity-academic partnership
dc.subjectpeace education
dc.subjectprogram evaluation
dc.subjectyouth violence
dc.subjectCommunity-Based Research
dc.subjectCommunity Health and Preventive Medicine
dc.subjectEducation
dc.subjectPeace and Conflict Studies
dc.subjectPublic Health and Community Nursing
dc.titleA Community-Academic Partnership for School-Based Nonviolence Education: The Healthy Power Program
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleThe Journal of school health
dc.source.volume90
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsn_pp/130
dc.identifier.contextkey16535571
html.description.abstract<p>BACKGROUND: Youth violence is a significant problem affecting community health. Community-academic partnerships can advance youth nonviolence education by synergizing the strengths of collaborators while working toward a common goal. We describe a collaboration between an urban public middle school, community nonprofit, and university-based graduate school of nursing in implementing and evaluating the Healthy Power program, a school-based youth nonviolence program for middle-school boys.</p> <p>METHODS: A participatory program evaluation approach was used to plan and implement evaluation of the Healthy Power program with a cohort of 8 students. Collaborative planning allowed for the selection of measures that reflected program objectives and were of value to community partners while also scientifically sound. A mixed-methods approach included a focus group and a pretest-posttest with quantitative items and open-ended questions.</p> <p>RESULTS: While the quantitative pre-posttest did not show any significant change, the open-ended questions and focus group suggested that students had advanced their understanding and application of conflict resolution skills.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the usefulness of community-academic partnerships for peace/conflict resolution education and program evaluation. Such programs may benefit from mixed methods of evaluation.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsn_pp/130
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Nursing
dc.source.pages65-69


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record