Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTerrien, Jill M.
dc.contributor.authorHale, Janet Fraser
dc.contributor.authorCahan, Mitchell A.
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Mark E.
dc.contributor.authorSullivan, Kate M.
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Joanne
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:05.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:17:20Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:17:20Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-01
dc.date.submitted2017-01-05
dc.identifier.citationTerrien, J. M., Hale, J. F., Cahan, M., Quirk, M., Sullivan, K., Lewis, J. (2016). The impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MDTM modules on critical thinking of nurse practitioner students: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(1), 55. DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55">Link to article on publisher's website</a>. Copyright the authors. This publication is open access and the publisher PDF is posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/about/submissions#copyrightNotice.
dc.identifier.doi10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34541
dc.description.abstractObjective: Nurse practitioner (NP) students at our graduate school of nursing use WISE-MDTM simulation modules in the curriculum. This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was undertaken to evaluate critical-thinking outcomes associated with adding metacognitive deliberate-reflection guidance to the learning strategy with WISE-MDTM simulation modules. Methods: Of 33 NP students randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, 16 completed the study. The intervention group received WISE-MDTM learning modules with specific guidance or deliberate reflection. Controls used the modules with instructions for periodic free-thought reflections. Students’ tape-recorded reflections were categorized according to author-developed critical-thinking categories. Data were analyzed using NVIVOTM. Students’ feedback was collected by post-intervention anonymous survey. Results: Critical thinking outcomes (student responses to exercises after free-thinking or deliberate-reflection guidance) did not differ between groups. However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher level of critical thought after deliberate-reflection guidance. Post-intervention quantitative and qualitative feedback from both groups endorsed the value of the WISE-MDTM modules for NP education. Conclusions: Despite no difference in unprompted outcomes between groups, the intervention group often verbalized more thoughtful clinical decision-making. We speculate that the deliberate-reflection guidance intervention utilized with students throughout only two modules was insufficient for them to internalize the critical-thinking process. We propose using free-thought reflections with one or two WISE-MDTM modules to identify struggling students’ clinical decision-making process. These students’ remediation plan could include recording their deliberate-reflection process while viewing WISE-MDTM modules. Students would be guided to verbalize and record their critical-thinking processes for faculty review until students sufficiently integrate the process into their clinical decision-making.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSciedu Press
dc.rightsCopyright the authors. This publication is open access and the publisher PDF is posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/about/submissions#copyrightNotice.
dc.subjectWISE-MD
dc.subjectDeliberate reflection
dc.subjectSelf-reflection
dc.subjectThink aloud
dc.subjectCritical thinking
dc.subjectNurse practitioner students
dc.subjectAdvanced health assessment
dc.subjectMedical Education
dc.subjectNursing
dc.titleThe impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MDTM modules on critical thinking of nurse practitioner students: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Nursing Education and Practice
dc.source.volume6
dc.source.issue1
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&amp;context=gsn_pp&amp;unstamped=1
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsn_pp/52
dc.identifier.contextkey9516081
refterms.dateFOA2022-08-23T16:17:20Z
html.description.abstract<p>Objective: Nurse practitioner (NP) students at our graduate school of nursing use WISE-MDTM simulation modules in the curriculum. This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was undertaken to evaluate critical-thinking outcomes associated with adding metacognitive deliberate-reflection guidance to the learning strategy with WISE-MDTM simulation modules.</p> <p>Methods: Of 33 NP students randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, 16 completed the study. The intervention group received WISE-MDTM learning modules with specific guidance or deliberate reflection. Controls used the modules with instructions for periodic free-thought reflections. Students’ tape-recorded reflections were categorized according to author-developed critical-thinking categories. Data were analyzed using NVIVOTM. Students’ feedback was collected by post-intervention anonymous survey.</p> <p>Results: Critical thinking outcomes (student responses to exercises after free-thinking or deliberate-reflection guidance) did not differ between groups. However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher level of critical thought after deliberate-reflection guidance. Post-intervention quantitative and qualitative feedback from both groups endorsed the value of the WISE-MDTM modules for NP education.</p> <p>Conclusions: Despite no difference in unprompted outcomes between groups, the intervention group often verbalized more thoughtful clinical decision-making. We speculate that the deliberate-reflection guidance intervention utilized with students throughout only two modules was insufficient for them to internalize the critical-thinking process. We propose using free-thought reflections with one or two WISE-MDTM modules to identify struggling students’ clinical decision-making process. These students’ remediation plan could include recording their deliberate-reflection process while viewing WISE-MDTM modules. Students would be guided to verbalize and record their critical-thinking processes for faculty review until students sufficiently integrate the process into their clinical decision-making.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathgsn_pp/52
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate School of Nursing
dc.source.pages55


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
6862_26695_1_PB.pdf
Size:
550.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record