The impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MDTM modules on critical thinking of nurse practitioner students: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study
| dc.contributor.author | Terrien, Jill M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hale, Janet Fraser | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cahan, Mitchell A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Quirk, Mark E. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sullivan, Kate M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lewis, Joanne | |
| dc.date | 2022-08-11T08:09:05.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T16:17:20Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-08-23T16:17:20Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-01-01 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2017-01-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Terrien, J. M., Hale, J. F., Cahan, M., Quirk, M., Sullivan, K., Lewis, J. (2016). The impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MDTM modules on critical thinking of nurse practitioner students: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(1), 55. DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55">Link to article on publisher's website</a>. Copyright the authors. This publication is open access and the publisher PDF is posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/about/submissions#copyrightNotice. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5430/jnep.v6n1p55 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34541 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective: Nurse practitioner (NP) students at our graduate school of nursing use WISE-MDTM simulation modules in the curriculum. This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was undertaken to evaluate critical-thinking outcomes associated with adding metacognitive deliberate-reflection guidance to the learning strategy with WISE-MDTM simulation modules. Methods: Of 33 NP students randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, 16 completed the study. The intervention group received WISE-MDTM learning modules with specific guidance or deliberate reflection. Controls used the modules with instructions for periodic free-thought reflections. Students’ tape-recorded reflections were categorized according to author-developed critical-thinking categories. Data were analyzed using NVIVOTM. Students’ feedback was collected by post-intervention anonymous survey. Results: Critical thinking outcomes (student responses to exercises after free-thinking or deliberate-reflection guidance) did not differ between groups. However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher level of critical thought after deliberate-reflection guidance. Post-intervention quantitative and qualitative feedback from both groups endorsed the value of the WISE-MDTM modules for NP education. Conclusions: Despite no difference in unprompted outcomes between groups, the intervention group often verbalized more thoughtful clinical decision-making. We speculate that the deliberate-reflection guidance intervention utilized with students throughout only two modules was insufficient for them to internalize the critical-thinking process. We propose using free-thought reflections with one or two WISE-MDTM modules to identify struggling students’ clinical decision-making process. These students’ remediation plan could include recording their deliberate-reflection process while viewing WISE-MDTM modules. Students would be guided to verbalize and record their critical-thinking processes for faculty review until students sufficiently integrate the process into their clinical decision-making. | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Sciedu Press | |
| dc.rights | Copyright the authors. This publication is open access and the publisher PDF is posted as allowed by the publisher's author rights policy at http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/jnep/about/submissions#copyrightNotice. | |
| dc.subject | WISE-MD | |
| dc.subject | Deliberate reflection | |
| dc.subject | Self-reflection | |
| dc.subject | Think aloud | |
| dc.subject | Critical thinking | |
| dc.subject | Nurse practitioner students | |
| dc.subject | Advanced health assessment | |
| dc.subject | Medical Education | |
| dc.subject | Nursing | |
| dc.title | The impact of deliberate reflection with WISE-MDTM modules on critical thinking of nurse practitioner students: A prospective, randomized controlled pilot study | |
| dc.type | Journal Article | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of Nursing Education and Practice | |
| dc.source.volume | 6 | |
| dc.source.issue | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1051&context=gsn_pp&unstamped=1 | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/gsn_pp/52 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 9516081 | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2022-08-23T16:17:20Z | |
| html.description.abstract | <p>Objective: Nurse practitioner (NP) students at our graduate school of nursing use WISE-MDTM simulation modules in the curriculum. This prospective randomized controlled pilot study was undertaken to evaluate critical-thinking outcomes associated with adding metacognitive deliberate-reflection guidance to the learning strategy with WISE-MDTM simulation modules.</p> <p>Methods: Of 33 NP students randomly assigned to intervention and control groups, 16 completed the study. The intervention group received WISE-MDTM learning modules with specific guidance or deliberate reflection. Controls used the modules with instructions for periodic free-thought reflections. Students’ tape-recorded reflections were categorized according to author-developed critical-thinking categories. Data were analyzed using NVIVOTM. Students’ feedback was collected by post-intervention anonymous survey.</p> <p>Results: Critical thinking outcomes (student responses to exercises after free-thinking or deliberate-reflection guidance) did not differ between groups. However, the intervention group demonstrated a higher level of critical thought after deliberate-reflection guidance. Post-intervention quantitative and qualitative feedback from both groups endorsed the value of the WISE-MDTM modules for NP education.</p> <p>Conclusions: Despite no difference in unprompted outcomes between groups, the intervention group often verbalized more thoughtful clinical decision-making. We speculate that the deliberate-reflection guidance intervention utilized with students throughout only two modules was insufficient for them to internalize the critical-thinking process. We propose using free-thought reflections with one or two WISE-MDTM modules to identify struggling students’ clinical decision-making process. These students’ remediation plan could include recording their deliberate-reflection process while viewing WISE-MDTM modules. Students would be guided to verbalize and record their critical-thinking processes for faculty review until students sufficiently integrate the process into their clinical decision-making.</p> | |
| dc.identifier.submissionpath | gsn_pp/52 | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Family Medicine and Community Health | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Surgery | |
| dc.contributor.department | Graduate School of Nursing | |
| dc.source.pages | 55 |
