Data quality assurance and control in cognitive research: Lessons learned from the PREDICT-HD study
Authors
Westervelt, Holly JamesBernier, Rachel A.
Faust, Melanie
Gover, Mary
Bockholt, H. Jeremy
Zschiegner, Roland
Long, Jeffrey D.
Paulsen, Jane S.
UMass Chan Affiliations
Graduate School of NursingDocument Type
Journal ArticlePublication Date
2017-09-01Keywords
cognitive assessmentquality assurance
quality control
Biostatistics
Nursing
Psychiatry and Psychology
Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies
Research Methods in Life Sciences
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We discuss the strategies employed in data quality control and quality assurance for the cognitive core of Neurobiological Predictors of Huntington's Disease (PREDICT-HD), a long-term observational study of over 1,000 participants with prodromal Huntington disease. In particular, we provide details regarding the training and continual evaluation of cognitive examiners, methods for error corrections, and strategies to minimize errors in the data. We present five important lessons learned to help other researchers avoid certain assumptions that could potentially lead to inaccuracies in their cognitive data.Source
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1534. Epub 2017 Feb 17. Link to article on publisher's site
DOI
10.1002/mpr.1534Permanent Link to this Item
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34573PubMed ID
28211597Related Resources
ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/mpr.1534