Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDrake, Robert E.
dc.contributor.authorEssock, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorShaner, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorCarey, Kate B.
dc.contributor.authorMinkoff, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorKola, Lenore
dc.contributor.authorLynde, David
dc.contributor.authorOsher, Fred C.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Robin E.
dc.contributor.authorRickards, Lawrence
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:06.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:00Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:00Z
dc.date.issued2001-03-29
dc.date.submitted2010-03-05
dc.identifier.citationPsychiatr Serv. 2001 Apr;52(4):469-76.
dc.identifier.issn1075-2730 (Linking)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34711
dc.description.abstractAfter 20 years of development and research, dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness are emerging as an evidence-based practice. Effective dual diagnosis programs combine mental health and substance abuse interventions that are tailored for the complex needs of clients with comorbid disorders. The authors describe the critical components of effective programs, which include a comprehensive, long-term, staged approach to recovery; assertive outreach; motivational interventions; provision of help to clients in acquiring skills and supports to manage both illnesses and to pursue functional goals; and cultural sensitivity and competence. Many state mental health systems are implementing dual diagnosis services, but high-quality services are rare. The authors provide an overview of the numerous barriers to implementation and describe implementation strategies to overcome the barriers. Current approaches to implementing dual diagnosis programs involve organizational and financing changes at the policy level, clarity of program mission with structural changes to support dual diagnosis services, training and supervision for clinicians, and dissemination of accurate information to consumers and families to support understanding, demand, and advocacy.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=11274491&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/52/4/469
dc.subjectCounseling
dc.subjectCulture
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Medicine
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMental Disorders
dc.subjectMental Health Services
dc.subjectPatient Advocacy
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectSubstance-Related Disorders
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.titleImplementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
dc.source.volume52
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/26
dc.identifier.contextkey1201607
html.description.abstract<p>After 20 years of development and research, dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness are emerging as an evidence-based practice. Effective dual diagnosis programs combine mental health and substance abuse interventions that are tailored for the complex needs of clients with comorbid disorders. The authors describe the critical components of effective programs, which include a comprehensive, long-term, staged approach to recovery; assertive outreach; motivational interventions; provision of help to clients in acquiring skills and supports to manage both illnesses and to pursue functional goals; and cultural sensitivity and competence. Many state mental health systems are implementing dual diagnosis services, but high-quality services are rare. The authors provide an overview of the numerous barriers to implementation and describe implementation strategies to overcome the barriers. Current approaches to implementing dual diagnosis programs involve organizational and financing changes at the policy level, clarity of program mission with structural changes to support dual diagnosis services, training and supervision for clinicians, and dissemination of accurate information to consumers and families to support understanding, demand, and advocacy.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathhealthpolicy_pp/26
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Policy and Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages469-76


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record