Show simple item record

The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness

dc.contributor.authorMueser, Kim T.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Robin E.
dc.contributor.authorHaines, Michael
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Robert E.
dc.contributor.authorMcHugo, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorBond, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorEssock, Susan M.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Deborah R.
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Rosemarie
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Karin
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:03Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:03Z
dc.date.issued2004-07-29
dc.date.submitted2010-03-05
dc.identifier.citationJ Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Jun;72(3):479-90. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn0022-006X (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34721
dc.description.abstractThe authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15279531&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.3.479
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
dc.subject*Employment, Supported
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMental Disorders
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.titleThe Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
dc.source.volume72
dc.source.issue3
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/35
dc.identifier.contextkey1201616
html.description.abstract<p>The authors compared 3 approaches to vocational rehabilitation for severe mental illness (SMI): the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment, a psychosocial rehabilitation (PSR) program, and standard services. Two hundred four unemployed clients (46% African American, 30% Latino) with SMI were randomly assigned to IPS, PSR, or standard services and followed for 2 years. Clients in IPS had significantly better employment outcomes than clients in PSR and standard services, including more competitive work (73.9% vs. 18.2% vs. 27.5%, respectively) and any paid work (73.9% vs. 34.8% vs. 53.6%, respectively). There were few differences in nonvocational outcomes between programs. IPS is a more effective model than PSR or standard brokered vocational services for improving employment outcomes in clients with SMI.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathhealthpolicy_pp/35
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Policy and Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages479-90


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record