Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorXie, Haiyi
dc.contributor.authorMcHugo, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorSengupta, Anjana
dc.contributor.authorClark, Robin E.
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Robert E.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:03Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:03Z
dc.date.issued2004-12-14
dc.date.submitted2010-03-05
dc.identifier.citationMent Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;6(4):239-46.
dc.identifier.issn1522-3434 (Linking)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34723
dc.description.abstractHealth care utilization and cost data have challenged analysts because they are often correlated over time, highly skewed, and clumped at 0. Traditional approaches do not address all these problems, and evaluators of mental health and substance abuse interventions often grapple with the problem of how to analyze these data in a way that accurately represents program impact. Recently, the traditional 2-part model has been extended to mixed-effects mixed-distribution model with correlated random effects to deal simultaneously with excess zeros, skewness, and correlated observations. We introduce and demonstrate this new method to mental health services researchers and evaluators by analyzing the data from a study of assertive community treatment (ACT). The response variable is the number of days of hospitalization, collected every 6 months over 3 years. The explanatory variable is group: ACT vs. standard case management. Diagnosis (schizophrenia vs. bipolar disorder), time, and the baseline values of hospital days are covariates. Results indicate that clients in the ACT group have a higher probability of hospital admission, but tend to have shorter lengths of stay. The mixed-distribution model provides greater specification of a model to fit these data and leads to more refined interpretation of the results.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=15588034&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:MHSR.0000044749.39484.1b
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCase Management
dc.subjectCommunity Mental Health Services
dc.subjectData Interpretation, Statistical
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectHospitals, Psychiatric
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLongitudinal Studies
dc.subjectModels, Econometric
dc.subject*Models, Statistical
dc.subjectNew Hampshire
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment (Health Care)
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
dc.subjectStatistical Distributions
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.titleA method for analyzing longitudinal outcomes with many zeros
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitleMental health services research
dc.source.volume6
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/37
dc.identifier.contextkey1201618
html.description.abstract<p>Health care utilization and cost data have challenged analysts because they are often correlated over time, highly skewed, and clumped at 0. Traditional approaches do not address all these problems, and evaluators of mental health and substance abuse interventions often grapple with the problem of how to analyze these data in a way that accurately represents program impact. Recently, the traditional 2-part model has been extended to mixed-effects mixed-distribution model with correlated random effects to deal simultaneously with excess zeros, skewness, and correlated observations. We introduce and demonstrate this new method to mental health services researchers and evaluators by analyzing the data from a study of assertive community treatment (ACT). The response variable is the number of days of hospitalization, collected every 6 months over 3 years. The explanatory variable is group: ACT vs. standard case management. Diagnosis (schizophrenia vs. bipolar disorder), time, and the baseline values of hospital days are covariates. Results indicate that clients in the ACT group have a higher probability of hospital admission, but tend to have shorter lengths of stay. The mixed-distribution model provides greater specification of a model to fit these data and leads to more refined interpretation of the results.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathhealthpolicy_pp/37
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Policy and Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages239-46


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record