Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCook, Judith A.
dc.contributor.authorLeff, H. Stephen
dc.contributor.authorBlyler, Crystal R.
dc.contributor.authorGold, Paul B.
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Richard W.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Robin E.
dc.contributor.authorOnken, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorShafer, Michael S.
dc.contributor.authorBlankertz, Laura E.
dc.contributor.authorMcFarlane, William R.
dc.contributor.authorRazzano, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorBurke-Miller, Jane K.
dc.date2022-08-11T08:09:07.000
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-23T16:18:04Z
dc.date.available2022-08-23T16:18:04Z
dc.date.issued2006-04-11
dc.date.submitted2010-03-05
dc.identifier.citationPsychiatr Serv. 2006 Apr;57(4):465-71. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.465">Link to article on publisher's site</a>
dc.identifier.issn1075-2730 (Linking)
dc.identifier.doi10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.465
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14038/34727
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 removes work disincentives and promotes access to vocational services for people with disabilities. This study calculated the amount of payments that would have been made to employment service providers if study participants had been enrolled in the Ticket program. METHODS: Data were from 450 Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries with psychiatric disabilities enrolled in a multisite study of supported employment. Earnings over two years were used to calculate provider payments under two reimbursement formulas used in the Ticket program. RESULTS: Only a quarter of service recipients (26 percent) reached earnings levels that would have triggered provider payments under the first reimbursement formula. Only 4 percent would have completed their trial work period and left the rolls, generating payments under the second formula. CONCLUSIONS: The current provider payment systems of the Ticket to Work program do not reflect the reality of rehabilitation for individuals with severe mental illness. Reforms should take into account outcomes of return-to-work services for this population.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=pubmed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=16603740&dopt=Abstract">Link to Article in PubMed</a>
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.4.465
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCosts and Cost Analysis
dc.subjectEmployment
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInterviews as Topic
dc.subjectMale
dc.subject*Mental Disorders
dc.subjectRehabilitation, Vocational
dc.subjectReimbursement Mechanisms
dc.subjectUnited States
dc.subjectUnited States Social Security Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Administration
dc.subjectHealth Services Research
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.titleEstimated payments to employment service providers for persons with mental illness in the Ticket to Work program
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.source.journaltitlePsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
dc.source.volume57
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/healthpolicy_pp/40
dc.identifier.contextkey1201621
html.description.abstract<p>OBJECTIVE: The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 removes work disincentives and promotes access to vocational services for people with disabilities. This study calculated the amount of payments that would have been made to employment service providers if study participants had been enrolled in the Ticket program.</p> <p>METHODS: Data were from 450 Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries with psychiatric disabilities enrolled in a multisite study of supported employment. Earnings over two years were used to calculate provider payments under two reimbursement formulas used in the Ticket program.</p> <p>RESULTS: Only a quarter of service recipients (26 percent) reached earnings levels that would have triggered provider payments under the first reimbursement formula. Only 4 percent would have completed their trial work period and left the rolls, generating payments under the second formula.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS: The current provider payment systems of the Ticket to Work program do not reflect the reality of rehabilitation for individuals with severe mental illness. Reforms should take into account outcomes of return-to-work services for this population.</p>
dc.identifier.submissionpathhealthpolicy_pp/40
dc.contributor.departmentClinical and Population Health Research
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Policy and Research
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health
dc.source.pages465-71


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record